Trends in HCAHPS Survey Scores, 2008–2019

Author:

Beckett Megan K.1,Quigley Denise D.1,Cohea Christopher W.2,Lehrman William G.3,Russ Chelsea2,Giordano Laura A.2,Goldstein Elizabeth3,Elliott Marc N.1

Affiliation:

1. RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA

2. Health Services Advisory Group, Phoenix, AZ

3. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Baltimore, MD

Abstract

Background: HCAHPS’ 2008 initial public reporting, 2012 inclusion in the Hospital Value-Based Purchasing Program (HVBP), and 2015 inclusion in Hospital Star Ratings were intended to improve patient experiences. Objectives: Characterize pre-COVID-19 (2008–2019) trends in hospital consumer assessment of healthcare providers and systems (HCAHPS) scores. Research Design: Describe HCAHPS score trends overall, by phase: (1) initial public reporting period (2008–2013), (2) first 2 years of HVBP (2013–2015), and (3) initial HCAHPS Star Ratings reporting (2015–2019); and by hospital characteristics (HCAHPS decile, ownership, size, teaching affiliation, and urban/rural). Subjects: A total of 3909 HCAHPS-participating US hospitals. Measures: HCAHPS summary score (HCAHPS-SS) and 9 measures. Results: The mean 2007–2019 HCAHPS-SS improvement in most-positive-category (“top-box”) responses was +5.2 percentage points/pp across all hospitals (where differences of 5pp, 3pp, and 1pp are “large,” “medium,” and “small”). Improvement rate was largest in phase 1 (+0.8/pp/year vs. +0.2pp/year and +0.1pp/year for phases 2 and 3, respectively). Improvement was largest for Overall Rating of Hospital (+8.5pp), Discharge Information (+7.3pp), and Nurse Communication (+6.5pp), smallest for Doctor Communication (+0.8pp). Some measures improved notably through phases 2 and 3 (Nurse Communication, Staff Responsiveness, Overall Rating of Hospital), but others slowed or reversed in Phase 3 (Communication about Medicines, Quietness). Bottom-decile hospitals improved more than other hospitals for all measures. Conclusions: All HCAHPS measures improved rapidly 2008–2013, especially among low-performing (bottom-decile) hospitals, narrowing the range of performance and improving scores overall. This initial improvement may reflect widespread, general quality improvement (QI) efforts in lower-performing hospitals. Subsequent slower improvement following the introduction of HVBP and Star Ratings may have reflected targeted, resource-intensive QI in higher-performing hospitals.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3