Effect of Anesthesia Induction on Cardiac Hemodynamics in Patients Undergoing Durable Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation: The EACH-LVAD Study

Author:

Schurr James W.1ORCID,Sigal Ian1,Usman Asad2,Patel Prakash3,Lefebvre Benedicte4,Kurcik Kristy4,Atluri Pavan5ORCID,Acker Michael5ORCID,Bermudez Christian5,Rame J. Eduardo6ORCID,Hanff Thomas7ORCID,Cevasco Marisa5,Wald Joyce4

Affiliation:

1. Department of Medicine, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

2. Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

3. Department of Anesthesiology, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut

4. Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

5. Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

6. Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

7. Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Utah Hospital, Salt Lake City, Utah.

Abstract

Right ventricular (RV) dysfunction is common after left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation leading to clinical right heart failure (RHF) associated with worsened survival and quality of life. It is likely that intraoperative events such as anesthesia induction play a role in the development or unmasking of RV dysfunction in addition to known effects from hemodynamic changes that occur after LVAD implantation. The EACH-LVAD Study is a prospective, single-center, single-arm, observational cohort study of adult patients with advanced heart failure undergoing durable LVAD implantation with standard anesthesia induction. Intraoperative RV hemodynamics via central venous pressure, mean pulmonary artery pressure, pulmonary artery pulsatility index, and vasoactive-inotropic score (a simple weighted summation of standardized drug doses) and echocardiographic parameters (RV fractional area change, RV area in diastole, RV basal diameter, septum position, RV function, tricuspid regurgitation) were measured and compared at prespecified timepoints, including postinduction. Postoperative clinical RHF was determined based on published definitions. Forty-two patients receiving a first-time LVAD were included between September 2017 and March 2019. Propofol-based induction was used in 31 patients and etomidate-based induction in eight patients. A significant increase in central venous pressure (CVP; p < 0.001), mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP; p < 0.001), and vasoactive inotropic score (VIS; p < 0.001) with associated decrease in pulmonary artery pulsatility index (PAPi; p < 0.001) was observed. Right ventricular function worsened throughout. Right heart failure occurred in 70% of patients. Propofol-based induction was not associated with a higher risk of RHF (relative risk [RR], 1.01 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 0.64–1.61]). The EACH-LVAD study demonstrates an effect of anesthesia induction on worsened RV hemodynamics and echocardiographic changes which may have an effect on the development of RHF.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Biomedical Engineering,General Medicine,Biomaterials,Bioengineering,Biophysics

Reference22 articles.

1. The risk of right ventricular failure with current continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices.;Loforte;Expert Rev Med Devices,2017

2. Right heart failure and “failure to thrive” after left ventricular assist device: Clinical predictors and outcomes.;Baumwol;J Heart Lung Transplant,2011

3. Right ventricular failure in patients with the HeartMate II continuous-flow left ventricular assist device: Incidence, risk factors, and effect on outcomes.;Kormos;J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg,2010

4. Right ventricular failure after left ventricular assist devices.;Lampert;J Heart Lung Transplant,2015

5. Left Ventricular assist device as destination therapy: A state of the science and art of long-term mechanical circulatory support.;Hanff;Curr Heart Fail Rep,2019

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3