Recommendations from the ISPO lower-limb COMPASS: Patient-reported and performance-based outcome measures

Author:

Tan Jade M.12ORCID,Halford Gregory R. J.23,Lukin Martina,Kohler Friedbert456ORCID

Affiliation:

1. La Trobe Sport and Exercise Medicine Research Centre, School of Allied Health, Human Services and Sport, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia

2. School of Physiotherapy, Podiatry, Prosthetics and Orthotics, School of Allied Health, Human Services and Sport, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia

3. International Society of Prosthetics and Orthotics (ISPO), Copenhagen, Denmark

4. School of Clinical Medicine, Medicine & Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia

5. Clinical Directorate Aged Care and Rehabilitation, South Western Sydney Local Health District, Liverpool, Australia

6. Rehabilitation Medicine, Braeside Hospital, Braeside Hospital, HammondCare Health, Sydney, Australia

Abstract

Background: Outcome measures (patient-reported and performance-based) are used widely but not uniformly within the clinical setting for individuals with lower-limb absence (LLA). The need for more detailed information by funding bodies, service planners and providers, and researchers requires the systematic and routine use of outcome measures. Currently, there is no consensus on which outcome measure(s) should be used for individuals with LLA. The aim of the International Society of Prosthetics and Orthotics (ISPO) lower-limb Consensus Outcome Measures for Prosthetic and Amputation Services (COMPASS) was to produce a recommended list of outcome measures to be actively promoted for routine use within clinical practice before and after an episode of care. Methods: Between May and June 2021, 46 users, clinicians, researchers, managers, and policymakers working in the field of LLA and prosthetic users met virtually. Consensus participants were first asked to complete an online survey with questions based on the results from a systematic review and the outcomes from an expert panel. A modified Delphi technique was used to determine outcome measures for use in routine clinical practice. This paper discusses the ISPO lower-limb COMPASS process from which recommendations were made. Results: The ISPO lower-limb COMPASS resulted in the following 6 recommendations: (1) Amputee Mobility Predictor, Timed Up and Go, Two-Minute Walk Test, Prosthetic Evaluation Questionnaire—Residual Limb Health, Prosthetic Evaluation Questionnaire—Utility, and Trinity Amputation and Prosthesis Experience Scales-Revised, which make up the ISPO lower-limb COMPASS; (2) Comprehensive High-Level Activity Mobility Predictor and Six-Minute Walk Test are 2 additional outcome measures recommended for higher-activity-level individuals with LLA, which make up the COMPASS+; (3) Patient-Specific Function Scale makes up the COMPASS Adjunct; (4) a generic health-related quality of life outcome measure such as the European Quality of Life-5D-5L or Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System—29 item can be used to supplement the COMPASS; (5) outcome measures suited to low- and middle-income countries need to be developed with a focus on activities such as sitting cross-legged, kneeling, squatting, and other culturally important mobility-related activities; and (6) translation, validation, and open sharing of translated outcome measures included in the COMPASS, COMPASS+, and COMPASS Adjunct occurs. Conclusion: The above recommendations represent the current status of knowledge on outcome measures for LLA based on research and international consensus and hence, will change over time. This work has been developed for clinicians and researchers to improve knowledge on outcome measures to guide clinical decision-making and future research initiatives.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Rehabilitation,Health Professions (miscellaneous)

Reference144 articles.

1. Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn't;Sackett;BMJ,1996

2. Electrical units of measurement;Thomson;Popular Lect Address,1883

3. Clinical outcome measures for rehabilitation of amputees: a review;Agrawal;Phys Med Rehabil Int,2016

4. Use of and confidence in administering outcome measures among clinical prosthetists: results from a national survey and mixed-methods training program;Gaunaurd;Prosthet Orthot Int,2015

5. Patient-reported outcome measures and patient-reported experience measures;Kingsley;BJA Educ,2017

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. 3D PRINTING IN PROSTHETICS, ORTHOTICS AND ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY: MYTH AND REALITY;CANADIAN PROSTHETICS & ORTHOTICS JOURNAL;2023-12-22

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3