Identifying China’s distinctive academic fields among the top 2% of influential scientists: A bibliometric analysis using Rasch KIDMAP

Author:

Wu Alice-Like1,Chou Willy23ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Medical Statistics and Analytics, Coding Research Center, Toronto, Canada

2. Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Chiali Chi-Mei Hospital, Tainan, Taiwan

3. 10 Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Chung San Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.

Abstract

Background: Leading scientists worldwide are recognized by their placement in the top 2% based on their career-spanning contributions, as categorized by the Science-Metrix classification. However, there has been little focus on the unique scientific fields and subfields that separate countries. Although the KIDMAP in the Rasch model has been utilized to depict student performance, its application in identifying distinctive academic areas remains unexplored. Our study uses this model to pinpoint unique research domains specific to countries based on the top 2% author data. Methods: We sourced our data from Elsevier career-long author database updated until the end of 2022. This encompassed 168 countries, 22 scientific domains, and 174 subdomains in 2021 and 2022 (with a total of 194,983 and 204,643 researchers, respectively). Our approach was threefold: identifying unique fields, subfields, and researchers. Visualizations included scatter plots, KIDMAP, and the Impact Bam Plot (IBP). China distinctive research areas were identified using the Rasch KIDMAP. Results: Key insights include the following: The US prevailing dominance in scientific domains in both 2021 and 2022. China distinct contribution in the “Enabling & Strategic Technologies” domain. China notable emphasis on the “Complementary & Alternative Medicine” subfield in 2022. Dr Phillip Low from the Mayo Clinic (US) emerged as a leading figure in the General & Internal Medicine research domain. Conclusions: Despite trailing the US in global research achievements, China showcased pronounced expertise in specific scientific areas, such as the “Complementary & Alternative Medicine” subfield in 2022, when compared to China other subfields based on the level of academic performance (−3.09 logits). Future research could benefit from incorporating KIDMAP visuals to gauge other countries’ strengths in various research sectors, expanding beyond the China-centric focus in this study.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Reference41 articles.

1. Authorship and citation patterns of highly cited biomedical researchers: a cross-sectional study.;Perneger;Res Integrity Peer Rev,2023

2. Updated science-wide author databases of standardized citation indicators.;Ioannidis;PLoS Biol,2020

3. A standardized citation metrics author database annotated for scientific field.;Ioannidis;PLoS Biol,2019

4. The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics.;Hicks;Nature,2015

5. The countries and languages that dominate biological research at the beginning of the 21st century.;Monge-Nájera;Rev Biol Trop,2005

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3