Dexmedetomidine Withdrawal Syndrome in Children in the PICU: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Author:

Knapp Thomas1,DiLeonardo Olivia2,Maul Tim3,Hochwald Alexander4,Li Zhuo4,Hossain Jobayer5,Lowry Adam3,Parker Jason3,Baker Kimberly3,Wearden Peter3,Nelson Jennifer36

Affiliation:

1. University of Central Florida, College of Medicine, Orlando, FL.

2. Department of Medical Education, Nemours Children’s Health, Orlando, FL.

3. Department of Cardiovascular Services, Nemours Children’s Health, Florida, Orlando, FL.

4. Division of Clinical Trials and Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL.

5. Department of Biomedical Research, Nemours Children’s Health, Wilmington, DE.

6. Department of Surgery, University of Central Florida College of Medicine, Orlando, FL.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To systematically review literature describing the clinical presentation, risk factors, and treatment for dexmedetomidine withdrawal in the PICU (PROSPERO: CRD42022307178). DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE/PubMed, Cochrane, Web of Science, and Scopus databases were searched. STUDY SELECTION: Eligible studies were published from January 2000 to January 2022 and reported clinical data for patients younger than 21 years old following discontinuation of dexmedetomidine after greater than or equal to 24 hours of infusion. DATA EXTRACTION: Abstracts identified during an initial search were screened and data were manually abstracted after full-text review of eligible articles. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to assess study quality. Summary statistics were provided and Spearman rank correlation coefficient was used to identify relationships between covariates and withdrawal signs. A weighted prevalence for each withdrawal sign was generated using a random-effects model. DATA SYNTHESIS: Twenty-three studies (22 of which were retrospective cohort studies) containing 28 distinct cohorts were included. Median cumulative dexmedetomidine exposure by dose was 105.95 μg/kg (range, 30–232.7 μg/kg), median dexmedetomidine infusion duration was 131.75 hours (range, 20.5–525.6 hr). Weighted estimates for proportion (95% CI) of subjects experiencing withdrawal signs across all cohorts were: hypertension 0.34 (range, 0.0–0.92), tachycardia 0.26 (range, 0.0–0.87), and agitation 0.26 (range, 0.09–0.77). Meta-analysis revealed no correlation between dexmedetomidine exposure variables and withdrawal signs. A moderate negative monotonic relationship existed between the proportion of patients who had undergone cardiac surgery and the proportion experiencing hypertension (correlation coefficient, –0.47; p = 0.048) and tachycardia (correlation coefficient, –0.57; p = 0.008), indicating that in cohorts with a higher proportion of patients who were postcardiac surgery, there were fewer occurrences of hypertension and or tachycardia. CONCLUSIONS: On review of the 2000–2022 literature, dexmedetomidine withdrawal may be characterized by tachycardia, hypertension, or agitation, particularly with higher cumulative doses or prolonged durations. Since most studies included in the review were retrospective, prospective studies are needed to further clarify risk factors, establish diagnostic criteria, and identify optimal management strategies.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine,Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health

Reference29 articles.

1. 2022 Society of Critical Care Medicine clinical practice guidelines on prevention and management of pain, agitation, neuromuscular blockade, and delirium in critically ill pediatric patients with consideration of the ICU environment and early mobility.;Smith;Pediatr Crit Care Med,2022

2. Survey of the current use of dexmedetomidine and management of withdrawal symptoms in critically ill children.;Thompson;J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther,2019

3. The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.;Page;BMJ (Clin Res Ed),2021

4. Methodological quality (risk of bias) assessment tools for primary and secondary medical studies: What are they and which is better?;Ma;Mil Med Res,2020

5. Risk of bias tools in systematic reviews of health interventions: An analysis of PROSPERO-registered protocols.;Farrah;Syst Rev,2019

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3