NIH peer review: Criterion scores completely account for racial disparities in overall impact scores-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

NIH peer review: Criterion scores completely account for racial disparities in overall impact scores

Published:2020-06-05 Issue:23 Volume:6 Page:
ISSN:2375-2548
Container-title:Science Advances
language:en
Short-container-title:Sci. Adv.

Author:

Erosheva Elena A.¹²³⁴^ORCID,Grant Sheridan¹^ORCID,Chen Mei-Ching⁵^ORCID,Lindner Mark D.⁵^ORCID,Nakamura Richard K.⁵⁶^ORCID,Lee Carole J.⁷^ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Statistics, Padelford Hall B-313, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.

2. School of Social Work, 4101 15th Avenue NE, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.

3. Center for Statistics and the Social Sciences, Padelford Hall C-14 University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.

4. Laboratoire J. A. Dieudonné, Université Côte d’Azur, CNRS, Nice, France.

5. Center for Scientific Review, National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20817, USA.

6. Retired volunteer at Center for Scientific Review, National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20817, USA.

7. Department of Philosophy, Savery Hall 361, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.

Abstract

Black-white disparities in preliminary peer review scores for NIH R01 grant applications are examined.

Funder

National Science Foundation

National Institutes of Health

Publisher

American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Subject

Multidisciplinary

Reference51 articles.

1. National Research Council Research Universities and the Future of America: Ten Breakthrough Actions Vital to Our Nation’s Prosperity and Security (National Research Council 2012).

2. National Academy of Engineering Engineering Research and America’s Future: Meeting the Challenges of a Global Economy (National Academy of Engineering 2005).

3. National Academy of Sciences National Academy of Engineering and and Institute of Medicine Expanding Underrepresented Minority Participation: America’s Science and Technology Talent at the Crossroads (National Academies Press 2010).

4. Weaving a Richer Tapestry in Biomedical Science

5. National Institutes of Health addresses the science of diversity

Cited by 84 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Editorial Comment on “Analysis of Abstracts Presented at an AUA Sectional Meeting: Duplicate Abstract Submissions and Previously Published Manuscript Data”;Urology;2024-09

2. Increasing Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Accessibility in Rare Disease Clinical Trials;Pharmaceutical Medicine;2024-07

3. The Howard‐Harvard effect: Institutional reproduction of intersectional inequalities;Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology;2024-05-31

4. Analysis of science journalism reveals gender and regional disparities in coverage;eLife;2024-05-28

5. Analysis of science journalism reveals gender and regional disparities in coverage;2024-05-17