Affiliation:
1. Department of Human Centered Design and Engineering, University of Washington, WA 98195, USA.
2. Information School, University of Washington Seattle, WA 98195, USA.
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic provides a unique opportunity to study science communication and, in particular, the transmission of consensus. In this study, we show how “science communicators,” writ large to include both mainstream science journalists and practiced conspiracy theorists, transform scientific evidence into two dueling consensuses using the effectiveness of masks as a case study. We do this by compiling one of the largest, hand-coded citation datasets of cross-medium science communication, derived from 5 million Twitter posts of people discussing masks. We find that science communicators selectively uplift certain published works while denigrating others to create bodies of evidence that support and oppose masks, respectively. Anti-mask communicators in particular often use selective and deceptive quotation of scientific work and criticize opposing science more than pro-mask communicators. Our findings have implications for scientists, science communicators, and scientific publishers, whose systems of sharing (and correcting) knowledge are highly vulnerable to what we term adversarial science communication.
Publisher
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
Reference94 articles.
1. The pivotal role of perceived scientific consensus in acceptance of science
2. Science audiences, misinformation, and fake news
3. N. Oreskes E. M. Conway Merchants of Doubt: How a Handful of Scientists Obscured the Truth on Issues from Tobacco Smoke to Global Warming (Bloomsbury 2012).
4. Tucker Carlson Tonight : FOXNEWSW : July 1 2021 10:00pm-11:00pm PDT (2021). Num Pages: 3657.