Gender and retention patterns among U.S. faculty

Author:

Spoon Katie1ORCID,LaBerge Nicholas1ORCID,Wapman K. Hunter1ORCID,Zhang Sam2ORCID,Morgan Allison C.1ORCID,Galesic Mirta3ORCID,Fosdick Bailey K.4,Larremore Daniel B.15ORCID,Clauset Aaron135ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Computer Science, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309, USA.

2. Department of Applied Mathematics, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309, USA.

3. Santa Fe Institute, Santa Fe, NM 87501, USA.

4. Department of Biostatistics and Informatics, Colorado School of Public Health, Aurora, CO 80045, USA.

5. BioFrontiers Institute, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80303, USA.

Abstract

Women remain underrepresented among faculty in nearly all academic fields. Using a census of 245,270 tenure-track and tenured professors at United States–based PhD-granting departments, we show that women leave academia overall at higher rates than men at every career age, in large part because of strongly gendered attrition at lower-prestige institutions, in non-STEM fields, and among tenured faculty. A large-scale survey of the same faculty indicates that the reasons faculty leave are gendered, even for institutions, fields, and career ages in which retention rates are not. Women are more likely than men to feel pushed from their jobs and less likely to feel pulled toward better opportunities, and women leave or consider leaving because of workplace climate more often than work-life balance. These results quantify the systemic nature of gendered faculty retention; contextualize its relationship with career age, institutional prestige, and field; and highlight the importance of understanding the gendered reasons for attrition rather than focusing on rates alone.

Publisher

American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Subject

Multidisciplinary

Reference114 articles.

1. Quantifying hierarchy and dynamics in US faculty hiring and retention

2. National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics Women minorities and persons with disabilities in science and engineering: 2021 (Special report NSF 21-321 2021).

3. Fixing the leaky pipeline: women scientists in academia.

4. Demographic Inertia and Women's Representation Among Faculty in Higher Education

5. Intersectional inequalities in science

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3