Intersectional inequalities in science-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Intersectional inequalities in science

Published:2022-01-04 Issue:2 Volume:119 Page:
ISSN:0027-8424
Container-title:Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
language:en
Short-container-title:Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.

Author:

Kozlowski Diego¹^ORCID,Larivière Vincent²³⁴,Sugimoto Cassidy R.⁴⁵,Monroe-White Thema⁶^ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Faculty of Science, Technology and Medicine, University of Luxembourg, Esch-Sur-Alzette 4364, Luxembourg;

2. École de Bibliothéconomie et des Sciences de L’information, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC H3T 1N8, Canada;

3. Observatoire des Sciences et des Technologies, Université du Québec à Montréal, Montreal, QC H3C 3P8, Canada;

4. Department of Science and Innovation-National Research Foundation Centre of Excellence in Scientometrics and Science, Technology and Innovation Policy, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch 7602, South Africa;

5. School of Public Policy, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30313;

6. Campbell School of Business, Berry College, Mount Berry, GA 30149

Abstract

Significance The US scientific workforce is not representative of the population. Barriers to entry and participation have been well-studied; however, few have examined the effect of these disparities on the advancement of science. Furthermore, most studies have looked at either race or gender, failing to account for the intersection of these variables. Our analysis utilizes millions of scientific papers to study the relationship between scientists and the science they produce. We find a strong relationship between the characteristics of scientists and their research topics, suggesting that diversity changes the scientific portfolio with consequences for career advancement for minoritized individuals. Science policies should consider this relationship to increase equitable participation in the scientific workforce and thereby improve the robustness of science.

Funder

Canada Research Chairs

Fonds National de la Recherche Luxembourg

Publisher

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Subject

Multidisciplinary

Link

https://pnas.org/doi/pdf/10.1073/pnas.2113067119

Reference105 articles.

1. UNESCO “Women in Science” (UNESCO Fact Sheet No. 55 2019). uis.unesco.org/sites/default/files/documents/fs55-women-in-science-2019-en.pdf. Accessed 21 December 2021.

2. Bibliometrics: Global gender disparities in science

3. US National Science Foundation “Women Minorities and Persons with Disabilities in Science and Engineering” (Tech. Rep. NSF 17-310 National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics Arlington VA 2017). https://www.nsf.gov/statistics/2017/nsf17310/digest/occupation/women.cfm. Accessed 21 December 2021.

4. L. Davis R. Fry College faculty have become more racially and ethnically diverse but remain far less so than students. Pew Research Center 31 July 2019. https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2019/07/31/us-college-faculty-student-diversity/. Accessed 17 December 2021.

5. Diversifying the faculty;Taylor O.;Peer Rev.,2010

Cited by 105 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. It takes a village: A multi-brain approach to studying multigenerational family communication;Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience;2024-02

2. COVID-19 as a chronic stressor and the importance of individual identity: A data-driven look at academic productivity during the pandemic;General and Comparative Endocrinology;2024-01

3. Gender homophily: In-group citation preferences and the gender disadvantage;Research Policy;2024-01

4. Resiliency of the comparative endocrinology community in the face of COVID-19;General and Comparative Endocrinology;2024-01

5. Changing the culture of peer review for a more inclusive and equitable psychological science.;Journal of Experimental Psychology: General;2023-12