Precursors of logical reasoning in preverbal human infants-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Precursors of logical reasoning in preverbal human infants

Published:2018-03-16 Issue:6381 Volume:359 Page:1263-1266
ISSN:0036-8075
Container-title:Science
language:en
Short-container-title:Science

Author:

Cesana-Arlotti Nicoló¹²^ORCID,Martín Ana¹^ORCID,Téglás Ernő²,Vorobyova Liza¹²,Cetnarski Ryszard¹³,Bonatti Luca L.¹⁴^ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Center for Brain and Cognition, Ramon Trias Fargas, 25-27, 08005 Barcelona, Spain.

2. Cognitive Development Centre, Central European University, H-1015 Budapest, Hungary.

3. Nencki Institute of Experimental Biology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Ludwika Pasteura 3, 02-093 Warszawa, Poland.

4. ICREA (Catalan Institution for Research and Advanced Studies), Pg. Lluís Companys 23, 08010 Barcelona, Spain.

Abstract

The infant as philosopher Visual behaviors, such as a shift in one's gaze or a prolonged stare, can be diagnostic of internal thoughts. Cesana-Arlotti et al. used these measures to demonstrate that preverbal infants can formulate a logical structure called a disjunctive syllogism (see the Perspective by Halberda). That is, if A or B is true, and A is false, then B must be true. Presenting infants with scenes where the outcome revealed B to be false evoked looks of surprise. Science , this issue p. 1263 ; see also p. 1214

Funder

H2020 European Research Council

Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad

Publisher

American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Subject

Multidisciplinary

Reference29 articles.

1. M. Piattelli-Palmarini Language and Learning: The Debate Between Jean Piaget and Noam Chomsky (Harvard Univ. Press 1980).

2. E. S. Spelke in Language in Mind: Advances in the Study of Language and Thought D. Gentner S. Goldin-Meadow Eds. (MIT Press 2003) pp. 277–311.

3. W. V. O. Quine Word and Object (MIT Press 1960).

4. Darwin's mistake: Explaining the discontinuity between human and nonhuman minds

5. S. Carey The Origin of Concepts (Oxford Univ. Press 2009).

Cited by 116 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Do early meanings of negation map onto a fully-fledged negation concept in infancy?;Cognition;2025-01

2. The Argument from Prepared Learning;The Building Blocks of Thought;2024-08-22

3. The Evolution of Fodor’s Case against Concept Learning;The Building Blocks of Thought;2024-08-22

4. Conclusion to Part III;The Building Blocks of Thought;2024-08-22

5. Embodied Cognition;The Building Blocks of Thought;2024-08-22