Highlighting health consequences of racial disparities sparks support for action

Author:

Brown Riana M.1ORCID,Dietze Pia2ORCID,Craig Maureen A.34ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Annenberg Public Policy Center and Department of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

2. Department of Psychological Science, University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA.

3. Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.

4. Department of Psychology, New York University, New York, NY, USA.

Abstract

Racial disparities arise across many vital areas of American life, including employment, health, and interpersonal treatment. For example, one in three Black children lives in poverty (versus one in nine white children), and, on average, Black Americans live four fewer years compared with white Americans. Which disparity is more likely to spark reduction efforts? We find that highlighting disparities in health-related (versus economic) outcomes spurs greater social media engagement and support for disparity-mitigating policy. Further, reading about racial health disparities elicits greater support for action (e.g., protesting) compared with economic- or belonging-based disparities. This occurs in part because people view health disparities as violating morally sacred values, which enhances perceived injustice. This work elucidates which manifestations of racial inequality are most likely to prompt Americans to action.

Publisher

American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Subject

Multidisciplinary

Reference52 articles.

1. M. Smith J. Bosman M. Davery “Flint’s water crisis started 5 years ago. It’s not over ” New York Times 25 April 2019; https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/25/us/flint-water-crisis.html.

2. Discrimination in the United States: Experiences of black Americans

3. J. Mack “Flint and Detroit among nation’s top 5 poorest cities new census data shows ” MLive 26 September 2019; https://www.mlive.com/news/2019/09/flint-and-detroit-among-nations-top-5-poorest-cities-new-census-data-shows.html.

4. How the disadvantaged appraise group-based exclusion: The path from legitimacy to illegitimacy

5. Four Core Social-Psychological Motivations to Undertake Collective Action

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3