Promote scientific integrity via journal peer review data-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Promote scientific integrity via journal peer review data

Published:2017-07-21 Issue:6348 Volume:357 Page:256-257
ISSN:0036-8075
Container-title:Science
language:en
Short-container-title:Science

Author:

Lee Carole J.¹,Moher David²³

Affiliation:

1. Department of Philosophy, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.

2. Centre for Journalology, Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, The Ottawa Hospital–General Campus, Ontario K1H 8L6, Canada.

3. Visiting Scholar, METRICS, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA 94304, USA.

Abstract

Publishers must invest, and manage risk

Publisher

American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Subject

Multidisciplinary

Reference20 articles.

1. A. Rowhani-Farid, A. Barnett, BMJ Open 6, e011784 (2016).

2. N. Vasilevsky . PeerJ Preprints (available at https://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.2588v1).

3. J. C. Bailar, K. Patterson, N. Engl. J. Med. 312, 654 (1985).

4. R. Bruce ., BMC Med. 14, 85 (2016).

5. S. van Rooyen ., Br. Med. J. 318, 23 (1999).

Cited by 54 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. From impact metrics and open science to communicating research: Journalists’ awareness of academic controversies;2024-09-04

2. Disciplinary Imbalances in Urology and Gynecology Research Publications within Functional Urology;Clinics and Practice;2024-08-29

3. Research Note—Making Peer Review Evidence-Based: It’s Time to Open the “Black Box”;Journal of Social Work Education;2024-08-22

4. Publisher preferences for a journal transparency tool: A modified three-round Delphi study;F1000Research;2024-08-09

5. Are the confidence scores of reviewers consistent with the review content? Evidence from top conference proceedings in AI;Scientometrics;2024-06-20