1. Kronick DA. Peer review in 18th-century scientific journalism. JAMA. 1990;263(10):1321–2.
2. Smith R. Peer review: reform or revolution? BMJ. 1997;315(7111):759–60.
3. Rennie D. Suspended judgment. Editorial peer review: let us put it on trial. Control Clin Trials. 1992;13(6):443–5.
4. Rennie R. Editorial peer review: its development and rationale. In: Godlee F, Jefferson T, editors. Peer review in health sciences. 2nd ed. London: BMJ Books; 2003. p. 1–13.
5. Public Library of Science. Peer review—optimizing practices for online scholarly communication. In: House of Commons Science and Technology Committee, editor. Peer Review in Scientific Publications, Eighth Report of Session 2010–2012, Vol. I: Report, Together with Formal, Minutes, Oral and Written Evidence. London: The Stationery Office Limited; 2011. p. 174–8.