Mindblind Eyes: An Absence of Spontaneous Theory of Mind in Asperger Syndrome

Author:

Senju Atsushi1,Southgate Victoria1,White Sarah2,Frith Uta23

Affiliation:

1. Centre for Brain and Cognitive Development, Birkbeck, University of London, London, UK.

2. Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London, London, UK.

3. Center of Functionally Integrative Neuroscience, Aarhus University, Aarhus University Hospital, Norrebrogade 44, Building 10 G, 800 Aarhus C, Denmark.

Abstract

Diverting Asperger Deficit Placement of Asperger syndrome within the family of autism spectrum disorders (ASD) has always been a bit uneasy; although people with Asperger syndrome do exhibit the core impairments in social interaction and communication that are characteristic of ASD, they nevertheless perform well on tests that are thought to assess the ability to mentalize or to possess Theory of Mind skills. One of the classic tests of mentalizing ability is the false-belief task, in which subjects must be able to represent their own beliefs (true) and another's beliefs, which are false because they have not been given complete information, such as not having seen the transfer of a piece of candy from one drawer to another. People with Asperger syndrome succeed at the verbal form of the false-belief task, yet Senju et al. (p. 883 , published online 16 July) show that this is owing entirely to their having learned how to cope with an existing and still demonstrable deficit in an implicit version of the false-belief task. That is, the core impairment is present, but conscious and explicit learning allows them to compensate.

Publisher

American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Subject

Multidisciplinary

Cited by 545 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Pupillary responses for social versus non-social stimuli in autism: A systematic review and meta-analysis;Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews;2024-11

2. The Argument from Prepared Learning;The Building Blocks of Thought;2024-08-22

3. The Evolution of Fodor’s Case against Concept Learning;The Building Blocks of Thought;2024-08-22

4. Conclusion to Part III;The Building Blocks of Thought;2024-08-22

5. Embodied Cognition;The Building Blocks of Thought;2024-08-22

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3