Affiliation:
1. Faculty of Education, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa
Abstract
School reform efforts have focussed on the principal as the major determinant of students’ outcome without saying much on the contribution of deputy principals. Deputy principals are 2nd on the school’s hierarchical structure. The distributed leadership construct advocates more actors in instructional leadership. In this study we examined whether deputy principals were engaged in instructional leadership practices for overall student performance. The study was carried out in high schools of the Gutu district of the Masvingo province in Zimbabwe. A qualitative research approach and a case study design were adopted for the study. Three deputy principals, 1 deputising at a government-run school, another at a church-run school and the other at a rural district council-run school were purposively sampled for document analysis, observation and multiple interviews. The findings reveal that deputy principals were engaged in instructional leadership practices cursorily and to a limited extent. Deputy principals performed instructional leadership tasks through vision statement formulation, supervision of lessons, monitoring students’ progress and modelling good teaching behaviour. In the era of accountability and distributed leadership, pressure mounts for more engagement of deputy principals as instructional leaders. We, therefore, recommend a collective approach to vision development by all stakeholders and the development of protocols that encompass pre- and post-observation conferences that mainly focus on the teacher.
Publisher
Education Association of South Africa
Reference54 articles.
1. Abonyi US & Sofo F 2021. Exploring instructional leadership practices of leaders in Ghanaian basic schools. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 24(6):838–854. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2019.1629628
2. Ahmed F, Ali S & Shah RA 2019. Exploring variations in summative assessment: Language teachers’ knowledge of students’ formative assessment and its effect on their summative assessment. Bulletin of Education and Research, 41(2):109–119. Available at https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1229441.pdf. Accessed 30 November 2023.
3. Ampofo SY, Onyango GA & Ogola M 2019. Influence of school heads’ direct supervision on teacher role performance in public senior high schools, central region, Ghana. IAFOR Journal of Education, 7(2):9–26. Available at https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1236226.pdf. Accessed 30 November 2023.
4. Bell CA, Dobbelaer MJ, Kleitte K & Visscher A 2019. Qualities of classroom observation systems. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 30(1):3–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2018.1539014
5. Billups FD 2020. Qualitative data collection tools: Design, development and applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.