Teachers’ representation of the mitigation strategies to challenges of implementing the 2015 to 2022 Zimbabwean social studies curriculum

Author:

Chimbunde Pfuurai1ORCID,Kgari-Masondo Maserole Christina1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. School of Education, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Edgewood, South Africa

Abstract

The impromptu launch of the 2015 to 2022 Zimbabwean social studies curriculum invited vilifications and public outcries from parents, teachers and other key stakeholders professing numerous challenges. In this article, we report on the teachers’ representation of the mitigation strategies to abate the aforesaid challenges. This interpretive case study engrained in the qualitative approach, was drawn from interviews and focus group discussion (FGD) to establish the teachers’ representation of the mitigation strategies that could be employed to curtail challenges faced in implementing that curriculum. In the study, informed by the ubuntu philosophy, we used 12 purposively sampled teachers from Zimbabwean primary schools located in different contexts to generate data. The findings show that implementers of policies are too often not consulted during the policy development process leading to challenges which could be mollified by listening to the advice from the implementers, adopting the bottom-up approach and promoting good relations among educators. Considering these findings it was concluded that, for effective policy development, there must be wide consultation and involvement of all stakeholders in the planning, designing and articulation of policies before proper implementation can take place.

Publisher

Education Association of South Africa

Subject

Education

Reference50 articles.

1. Berger PL & Luckmann L 1996. The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. New York, NY: Penguin Books.

2. Carl A 2005. The “voice of the teacher” in curriculum development: A voice crying in the wilderness? South African Journal of Education, 25(4):223–228.

3. Chimuka TA 2015. “Ubuntu”: The itinerary, import and utility of the idea. International Journal of African Society Cultures and Traditions, 2(2):58–78.

4. Creswell JW & Poth CN 2017. Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.

5. Cronin‐Jones LL 1991. Science teacher beliefs and their influence on curriculum implementation: Two case studies. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28(3):235–250. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660280305

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3