The level of difficulty and discrimination power of the items of the National Senior Certificate Mathematics Examination

Author:

Zondo Nombuso P.1ORCID,Zewotir Temesgen1ORCID,North Delia E.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. School of Mathematics, Statistics and Computer Science, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa

Abstract

South Africa’s National Senior Certificate examination system was introduced in 2008 as a single national examination system, in order to facilitate fair and standardised assessment and to provide all learners with an equal chance of access to higher education. However, limited research has been done to investigate the discrimination power of the actual examination items and the spread difficulty level for learners from different school quintile types. The purpose of the study reported on here was to investigate differential performance of learners in the items of the 2009 National Senior Certificate mathematics examination. The dataset used in this study was from the Western Cape (WC) Education Department. From the analysis, the results show that the discrimination power of the different examination questions was not identical across different school quintiles. Further investigation of the data reflects a considerable range of category difficulty levels, with higher (above average) ability levels being tested for learners in the quintile 1 to quintile 4 schools, while only learners with average abilities were being tested in the quintile 5 and independent schools.

Publisher

Education Association of South Africa

Subject

Education

Reference64 articles.

1. Ally N & McLaren D 2016. Fees are an issue at school too, not just university. GroundUp, 17 November. Available at https://www.groundup.org.za/article/fees-are-issue-school-too-not-just-university/. Accessed 31 January 2019.

2. An X & Yung YF 2014. Item response theory: What it is and how you can use the IRT procedure to apply it. Cary, NC: SAS Institute. Available at https://support.sas.com/resources/papers/proceedings14/SAS364-2014.pdf. Accessed 30 November 2021.

3. Baker FB 2001. The basics of item response theory (2nd ed). College Park, MD: ERIC Clearinghouse on Assessment and Evaluation. Available at https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED458219.pdf. Accessed 30 November 2021.

4. Banerjee PA 2016. A systematic review of factors linked to poor academic performance of disadvantaged students in science and maths in schools. Cogent Education, 3(1):1178441. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2016.1178441

5. Biggs J & Collis K 1989. Towards a model of school-based curriculum development and assessment using the SOLO taxonomy. Australian Journal of Education, 33(2):151–163. https://doi.org/10.1177/168781408903300205

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3