The relationship between collective narcissism and group-based moral exclusion: The mediating role of intergroup threat and social distance

Author:

Hadarics Márton,Szabó Zsolt Péter,Kende Anna

Abstract

In our study, we investigated the relationship between collective narcissism and group-based moral exclusion. Since collective narcissists are motivated to see their group as unique and superior, and tend to show hostility towards outgroups threatening this presumed superiority, we hypothesized that perceived intergroup threat and social distance can mediate the relationship between collective narcissism and group-based moral exclusion. We tested this assumption in two intergroup contexts by investigating the beliefs of members of the Hungarian majority population about Muslim immigrants and Roma people. Our results showed that collective narcissism had a positive indirect effect on group-based moral exclusion in the case of both outgroups. Furthermore, both threat and social distance were significant mediators in the case of Muslim immigrants, but mostly social distance mediated the indirect effect of collective narcissism on moral exclusion of the Roma. These results indicate that collective narcissists tend to rationalize their intergroup hostility by the mechanism of motivated moral exclusion, and to find suitable justifications for doing so.

Publisher

Leibniz Institute for Psychology (ZPID)

Subject

Sociology and Political Science,Applied Psychology,Social Psychology

Reference55 articles.

1. HadaricsM.SzabóZ. P.KendeA. (2020). Supplementary materials to "The relationship between collective narcissism and group-based moral exclusion: The mediating role of intergroup threat and social distance"[Additional information]. PsychOpen. https://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.4352

2. Arbuckle, J. L. (2017). Amos (Version 25.0) [Computer software]. Chicago, IL, USA: IBM SPSS.

3. Bandura, A. (2016). On structural evil: Disengaging from our moral selves. New York, NY, USA: Worth Publishers.

4. Bíró-Nagy, A. (2018). Politikai lottóötös: A migráció jelentősége a magyar politikában, 2014-2018. In B. Böcskei & A. Szabó (Eds.), Várakozások és valóságok: Parlamenti választás 2018 (pp. 269-291). Budapest, Hungary: Napvilág Kiadó.

5. Brislin, R. W. (1980). Translation and content analysis of oral and written material. In H. C. Triandis & J. W. Berry (Eds.), Handbook of Cross-Cultural Psychology: 2. Methodology (pp. 389-444). Boston, MA, USA: Allyn & Bacon.

Cited by 9 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3