Exploring the Barriers to the Implementation of Psychosocial Risk Assessment in Micro- and Small-Sized Firms

Author:

Pavlista Valeria1ORCID,Angerer Peter1,Kuske Johanna2,Schwens Christian2,Diebig and Mathias1

Affiliation:

1. Institute for Occupational, Social, and Environmental Medicine, Center for Health and Society, Medical Faculty, Heinrich HeineUniversity Duesseldorf, Germany

2. Professorship in Entrepreneurship and Management, Faculty of Management, Economics and Social Sciences, Universityof Cologne, Germany

Abstract

Abstract. According to the legal requirements in many countries, companies should conduct psychosocial risk assessments (PRA). However, recent studies have demonstrated deficiencies in PRA implementation. Especially micro- and small-sized enterprises (MSE) are in arrears. We conducted two explorative studies to shed light on this topic: We recruited MSE and examined their reasons for participation ( N = 7) and nonparticipation ( N = 21) in a nonresponder survey. Further, we analyzed longitudinal data capturing the PRA process over 18 months in 15 MSE within a case study. The attitude that stress is an important issue was a major reason for participation. The reasons given for nonparticipation were lack of interest in PRA and lack of stress. High time commitment and support were needed for complete PRA implementation. The reasons given for termination included low resources and prioritization of PRA. The results indicate that interest and awareness of the relevance of psychosocial stress need to increase, and that approaches requiring fewer resources are needed.

Publisher

Hogrefe Publishing Group

Subject

Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Applied Psychology

Reference47 articles.

1. An empirical analysis of the effectiveness of occupational health and safety management systems in SMEs

2. Psychologisches Wissen für die Praxis: Gefährdungsbeurteilungen im Arbeits- und Gesundheitsschutz

3. Bamberg, E., Mohr, G. & Wieland, R. (2016). Positionspapier zu Gefährdungsbeurteilungen psychischer Belastungen: Anforderungen aus arbeits – und organisationspsychologischer Sicht [Position paper on risk assessment of mental stress: Requirements from an occupational and organisational psychology perspective]. Retrieved from https://www.dgps.de/fileadmin/documents/Stellungnahmen/GBU_Stellungnahme_Langfassung_20160930.pdf

4. BAu, A. (2021). Handbuch Gefährdungsbeurteilung [Risk assessment manual]. https://doi.org/10.21934/baua:fachbuch20210127

5. Consideration of psychosocial factors in workplace risk assessments: findings from a company survey in Germany

Cited by 5 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Web-based occupational stress prevention in German micro- and small-sized enterprises – process evaluation results of an implementation study;BMC Public Health;2024-06-17

2. Der Ursache auf der Spur;Zeitschrift für wirtschaftlichen Fabrikbetrieb;2024-06-17

3. Implementierung von Maßnahmen zur Optimierung psychischer Belastungen im Kontext Hochschule;Zentralblatt für Arbeitsmedizin, Arbeitsschutz und Ergonomie;2024-05-07

4. The Application of Big Data and Artificial Intelligence Technology in Enterprise Information Security Management and Risk Assessment;Journal of Organizational and End User Computing;2023-07-28

5. Lohnen sich Maßnahmen gegen Arbeitsstress?;Organisationsberatung, Supervision, Coaching;2023-06-22

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3