Testing Practices in the 21st Century

Author:

Evers Arne1,Muñiz José2,Bartram Dave3,Boben Dusica4,Egeland Jens5,Fernández-Hermida José R.6,Frans Örjan7,Gintiliené Grazina8,Hagemeister Carmen9,Halama Peter10,Iliescu Dragos11,Jaworowska Aleksandra12,Jiménez Paul13,Manthouli Marina14,Matesic Krunoslav15,Schittekatte Mark16,Sümer H. Canan17,Urbánek Tomáš18

Affiliation:

1. University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands

2. University of Oviedo, Spain

3. SHL Group, Thames Ditton, UK

4. Drustvo Psihologov Slovenije, Ljubljana, Slovenia

5. Vestfold Mental Health Care Trust, Tønsberg, Norway

6. Spanish Psychological Association, Madrid, Spain

7. University of Uppsala, Sweden

8. Vilnius University, Lithuania

9. Technical University of Dresden, Germany

10. University of Trnava, Slovakia

11. Universitatea Babes-Bolyai, Cluj-Napoca, Romania

12. Psychological Test Laboratory of the Polish Psychological Association, Warsaw, Poland

13. University of Graz, Austria

14. Association of Greek Psychologists, Athens, Greece

15. University of Zagreb, Croatia

16. University of Gent, Belgium

17. Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey

18. Institute of Psychology, Academy of Sciences, Brno, Czech Republic

Abstract

The main goal of the European Federation of Psychologists’Associations (EFPA) Standing Committee on Tests and Testing (SCTT) is the improvement of testing practices in European countries. In order to reach this goal, the SCTT carries out various actions and projects, some of which are described in this paper. To better inform its work, it decided to survey the opinions of professional psychologists on testing practices. A questionnaire of 33 items was administered to a sample of 12,606 professional psychologists from 17 European countries. The questionnaire was based on, but not identical to, one used in 2000. The new data show that the positive attitude of the respondents toward the use of tests that was obtained in 2000 has increased in most countries, with a high percentage of the surveyed psychologists using tests regularly. Five main dimensions explained 43% of the total item variance. The dimensions involve items relating to: Concern over incorrect test use, regulations on tests and testing, Internet testing, appreciation of tests, and knowledge and training relating to tests and test use. Important differences between countries were found on these five dimensions. Differences were found according to gender for four of the five dimensions and in relation to field of specialization for all five dimensions. The most commonly used tests are the classic psychometric tests of intelligence and personality: WISC, WAIS, MMPI, RAVEN, 16PF, NEO-PI-R, BDI, SCL-90. Finally, some future perspectives are discussed.

Publisher

Hogrefe Publishing Group

Subject

General Psychology,Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)

Cited by 79 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3