Applicant Perceptions of Initial Job Candidate Screening With Asynchronous Job Interviews

Author:

Hiemstra Annemarie M. F.1ORCID,Oostrom Janneke K.2,Derous Eva3,Serlie Alec W.14,Born Marise Ph.1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Psychology, Education and Child Studies, Erasmus University Rotterdam, The Netherlands

2. Department of Management and Organization, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, The Netherlands

3. Department of Personnel Management, Work and Organizational Psychology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium

4. GITP, Utrecht, The Netherlands

Abstract

Abstract. Applicant fairness perceptions of asynchronous job interviews were assessed among panelists (Study 1, N = 160) and highly educated actual applicants (Study 2, N = 103). Furthermore, we also examined whether personality explained applicants’ perceptions. Participants, particularly actual applicants, had negative perceptions of the fairness and procedural justice of asynchronous job interviews. Extraverted applicants perceived more opportunity to perform with the asynchronous job interview than introverts. A trait interaction between Neuroticism and Extraversion was tested, but no significant results were found. Although the first selection stage is increasingly digitized, this study shows that applicant perceptions of asynchronous job interviews are relatively negative. The influence of personality on these perceptions appears to be limited.

Publisher

Hogrefe Publishing Group

Subject

Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Applied Psychology

Reference38 articles.

1. Applicant Reactions in Selection: Comprehensive meta-analysis into reaction generalization versus situational specificity

2. One Page or Two?: A National Study of CPA Recruiters' Preferences for Resume Length

3. Technology in the Employment Interview: A Meta-Analysis and Future Research Agenda

4. Asynchronous Video Interviewing as a New Technology in Personnel Selection: The Applicant’s Point of View

5. Brockner, J., Ackerman, G. & Fairchild, G. (2001). When do elements of procedural fairness make a difference? A classification of moderating influences. In J. Greenberg, & R. Cropanzano (Eds.), Advances in organisational justice (pp. 56–88). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3