Guidelines for the Assessment Process (GAP): A Proposal for Discussion

Author:

Fernández-Ballesteros R.1,De Bruyn E.E.J.2,Godoy A.3,Hornke L.F.4,Ter Laak J.5,Vizcarro C.1,Westhoff K.6,Westmeyer H.7,Zaccagnini J.L.3

Affiliation:

1. Autonoma University of Madrid, Spain

2. University of Nijmegen, The Netherlands

3. University of Malaga, Spain

4. RWTH Aachen, Germany

5. University of Utrecht, The Netherlands

6. University of Dresden, Germany

7. Free University of Berlin, Germany

Abstract

Summary: Current existing or proposed standards and guidelines in the field of psychological assessment are confined to psychological tests and psychological testing. But tests constitute only one category of psychological assessment procedures, and testing is only one of many available strategies or classes of actions in the course of the assessment process. Tests and testing are closely linked to a certain approach to psychological assessment, i. e., the psychometric one. This is one reason why it is relatively easy to formulate and establish standards or guidelines in the case of psychological tests and testing. The much more comprehensive assessment process is an indispensable part of any approach to psychological assessment, even of those that do not use psychometric tests. This makes the formulation of guidelines for the assessment process an ambitious and very difficult enterprise. But it can be done, at least at the level of recommendations that could help the assessor to cope with the complexities and demands of assessment processes in various contexts of psychological assessment. The European Association of Psychological Assessment (EAPA) decided to sponsor the development of Guidelines for the Assessment Process (GAP), setting up a Task Force for this specific purpose. The GAP introduced in this paper are intended as a first proposal to initiate a broad discussion about how to improve the practice of psychological assessment and the education and training of psychological assessors.

Publisher

Hogrefe Publishing Group

Subject

Applied Psychology

Reference33 articles.

1. American Psychological Association (1999). Standards for educational and psychological tests . Washington, DC: APA

2. Bartram, D. (1997). International guidelines for the development of test-user performance standards . Unpublished manuscript

3. Guidelines for Test Users: A Review of National and International Initiatives

4. Berman, P.S. (1997). Case conceptualization and treatment planning: Exercises for integrating theory with clinical practice . Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage

Cited by 41 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3