Reporting of health equity considerations in equity-relevant observational studies: Protocol for a systematic assessment

Author:

Dewidar OmarORCID,Rader Tamara,Waddington Hugh,Nicholls Stuart G,Little Julian,Hardy Billie-Jo,Horsley Tanya,Young Taryn,Cuervo Luis Gabriel,Sharp Melissa KORCID,Chamberlain Catherine,Shea Beverley,Craig Peter,Lawson Daeria O,Rizvi Anita,Wiysonge Charles SheyORCID,Kredo Tamara,Nguliefem Miriam NkanguORCID,Ghogomu Elizabeth,Francis Damian,Kristjansson Elizabeth,Bhutta Zulfiqar,Martin Alba Antequera,Melendez-Torres G J,Pantoja Tomas,Wang Xiaoqin,Jull Janet,Roberts Janet Hatcher,Funnell Sarah,White Howard,Krentel Alison,Mahande Michael JohnsonORCID,Ramke JacquelineORCID,Wells George A,Petkovic Jennifer,Tugwell Peter,Pottie Kevin,Mbuagbaw Lawrence,Welch Vivian

Abstract

Background: The mitigation of unfair and avoidable differences in health is an increasing global priority. Observational studies including cohort, cross-sectional and case-control studies tend to report social determinants of health which could inform evidence syntheses on health equity and social justice. However, the extent of reporting and analysis of equity in equity-relevant observational studies is unknown. Methods: We define studies which report outcomes for populations at risk of experiencing inequities as “equity-relevant”. Using a random sampling technique we will identify 320 equity-relevant observational studies published between 1 January 2020 to 27 April 2022 by searching the MEDLINE database. We will stratify sampling by 1) studies in high-income countries (HIC) and low- and middle-income countries (LMIC) according to the World Bank classification, 2) studies focused on COVID and those which are not, 3) studies focused on populations at risk of experiencing inequities and those on general populations that stratify their analyses. We will use the PROGRESS framework which stands for place of residence, race or ethnicity, occupation, gender or sex, religion, education, socioeconomic status, social capital, to identify dimensions where inequities may exist. Using a previously developed data extraction form we will pilot-test on eligible studies and revise as applicable. Conclusions: The proposed methodological assessment of reporting will allow us to systematically understand the current reporting and analysis practices for health equity in observational studies. The findings of this study will help inform the development of the equity extension for the STROBE (Strengthening the Reporting of Observational studies in Epidemiology) reporting guidelines.

Funder

Canadian Institutes of Health Research

Publisher

F1000 Research Ltd

Subject

General Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics,General Immunology and Microbiology,General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology,General Medicine

Reference58 articles.

1. Decade of Action - United Nations Sustainable Development: United Nations.

2. The concepts and principles of equity and health.;M Whitehead;Int. J. Health Serv.,1992

3. Health disparities and health equity: the issue is justice.;P Braveman;Am. J. Public Health.,2011

4. GRADE equity guidelines 4: considering health equity in GRADE guideline development: evidence to decision process.;K Pottie;J. Clin. Epidemiol.,2017

5. How effects on health equity are assessed in systematic reviews of interventions.;V Welch;Cochrane Database Syst. Rev.,2022

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3