Accuracy of the Mologic COVID-19 rapid antigen test: a prospective multi-centre analytical and clinical evaluation

Author:

Cubas-Atienzar Ana IORCID,Bell FionaORCID,Byrne Rachel L.ORCID,Buist Kate,Clark David J.,Cocozza Michael,Collins Andrea M.,Cuevas Luis E.,Duvoix AnnelyseORCID,Easom NicholasORCID,Edwards ThomasORCID,Ferreira Daniella M.ORCID,Fletcher Tom,Groppelli Elisabetta,Hyder-Wright Angela,Kadamus Ewelina,Kirwan Daniela E.,Kontogianni KonstantinaORCID,Krishna Sanjeev,Kluczna Diana,Mark Julian,Mensah-Kane Josephine,Miller ElishaORCID,Mitsi Elena,Norton Donna,O'Connor Emma,Owen Sophie I.ORCID,Planche Tim,Shelley Samuel,Staines Henry M.,Tate David,Thompson Caitlin R.,Walker Gemma,Williams Christopher T.,Wooding Dominic,Fitchett Joseph R. A.,Adams Emily R.

Abstract

Background: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has highlighted the reliance on antigen detection rapid diagnostic tests (Ag-RDTs). Their evaluation at point of use is a priority. Methods: Here, we report a multi-centre evaluation of the analytical sensitivity, specificity, and clinical accuracy of the Mologic COVID-19 Ag-RDT by comparing to reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) results from individuals with and without COVID-19 symptoms. Participants had attended hospitals in Merseyside, hospital and ambulance services in Yorkshire, and drive-through testing facilities in Northumberland, UK. Results: The limit of detection of the Mologic COVID-19 Ag-RDT was 5.0 x 102 pfu/ml in swab matrix with no cross-reactivity and interference for any other pathogens tested. A total of 347 participants were enrolled from 26th of November 2020 to 15th of February 2021 with 39.2% (CI 34.0-44.6) testing RT-qPCR positive for SARS-CoV-2. The overall sensitivity and specificity of the Mologic Ag-RDT compared to the reference SARS-CoV-2 RT-qPCR were 85.0% (95% CI 78.3-90.2) and 97.8% (95.0-99.3), respectively. Sensitivity was stratified by RT-qPCR cycle threshold (Ct) and 98.4% (91.3-100) of samples with a Ct less than 20 and 93.2% (86.5-97.2) of samples with a Ct less than 25 were detected using the Ag-RDT. Clinical accuracy was stratified by sampling strategy, swab type and clinical presentation. Mologic COVID-19 Ag-RDT demonstrated highest sensitivity with nose/throat swabs compared with throat or nose swabs alone; however, the differences were not statistically significant. Conclusions: Overall, the Mologic test had high diagnostic accuracy across multiple different settings, different demographics, and on self-collected swab specimens. These findings suggest the Mologic rapid antigen test may be deployed effectively across a range of use settings.

Funder

St. George’s Hospital Charity

Pfizer

Wellcome Trust

Publisher

F1000 Research Ltd

Subject

General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology,Medicine (miscellaneous)

Reference43 articles.

1. SARS-CoV-2 diagnostic pipeline.

2. Impact of delays on effectiveness of contact tracing strategies for COVID-19: a modelling study.;M Kretzschmar;Lancet Public Health.,2020

3. Effectiveness of isolation, testing, contact tracing, and physical distancing on reducing transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in different settings: a mathematical modelling study.;A Kucharski;Lancet Infect Dis.,2020

4. Diagnostic detection of 2019-nCoV by real-time RT-qPCR.;V Corman,2020

5. Weekly statistics for NHS Test and Trace (England): 7 January to 13 January 2021.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3