Accuracy of the Mologic COVID-19 rapid antigen test: a prospective multi-centre analytical and clinical evaluation
-
Published:2021-05-28
Issue:
Volume:6
Page:132
-
ISSN:2398-502X
-
Container-title:Wellcome Open Research
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Wellcome Open Res
Author:
Cubas-Atienzar Ana IORCID, Bell FionaORCID, Byrne Rachel L.ORCID, Buist Kate, Clark David J., Cocozza Michael, Collins Andrea M., Cuevas Luis E., Duvoix AnnelyseORCID, Easom NicholasORCID, Edwards ThomasORCID, Ferreira Daniella M.ORCID, Fletcher Tom, Groppelli Elisabetta, Hyder-Wright Angela, Kadamus Ewelina, Kirwan Daniela E., Kontogianni KonstantinaORCID, Krishna Sanjeev, Kluczna Diana, Mark Julian, Mensah-Kane Josephine, Miller ElishaORCID, Mitsi Elena, Norton Donna, O'Connor Emma, Owen Sophie I.ORCID, Planche Tim, Shelley Samuel, Staines Henry M., Tate David, Thompson Caitlin R., Walker Gemma, Williams Christopher T., Wooding Dominic, Fitchett Joseph R. A., Adams Emily R.
Abstract
Background: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has highlighted the reliance on antigen detection rapid diagnostic tests (Ag-RDTs). Their evaluation at point of use is a priority. Methods: Here, we report a multi-centre evaluation of the analytical sensitivity, specificity, and clinical accuracy of the Mologic COVID-19 Ag-RDT by comparing to reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) results from individuals with and without COVID-19 symptoms. Participants had attended hospitals in Merseyside, hospital and ambulance services in Yorkshire, and drive-through testing facilities in Northumberland, UK. Results: The limit of detection of the Mologic COVID-19 Ag-RDT was 5.0 x 102 pfu/ml in swab matrix with no cross-reactivity and interference for any other pathogens tested. A total of 347 participants were enrolled from 26th of November 2020 to 15th of February 2021 with 39.2% (CI 34.0-44.6) testing RT-qPCR positive for SARS-CoV-2. The overall sensitivity and specificity of the Mologic Ag-RDT compared to the reference SARS-CoV-2 RT-qPCR were 85.0% (95% CI 78.3-90.2) and 97.8% (95.0-99.3), respectively. Sensitivity was stratified by RT-qPCR cycle threshold (Ct) and 98.4% (91.3-100) of samples with a Ct less than 20 and 93.2% (86.5-97.2) of samples with a Ct less than 25 were detected using the Ag-RDT. Clinical accuracy was stratified by sampling strategy, swab type and clinical presentation. Mologic COVID-19 Ag-RDT demonstrated highest sensitivity with nose/throat swabs compared with throat or nose swabs alone; however, the differences were not statistically significant. Conclusions: Overall, the Mologic test had high diagnostic accuracy across multiple different settings, different demographics, and on self-collected swab specimens. These findings suggest the Mologic rapid antigen test may be deployed effectively across a range of use settings.
Funder
St. George’s Hospital Charity Pfizer Wellcome Trust
Publisher
F1000 Research Ltd
Subject
General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology,Medicine (miscellaneous)
Reference43 articles.
1. SARS-CoV-2 diagnostic pipeline. 2. Impact of delays on effectiveness of contact tracing strategies for COVID-19: a modelling study.;M Kretzschmar;Lancet Public Health.,2020 3. Effectiveness of isolation, testing, contact tracing, and physical distancing on reducing transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in different settings: a mathematical modelling study.;A Kucharski;Lancet Infect Dis.,2020 4. Diagnostic detection of 2019-nCoV by real-time RT-qPCR.;V Corman,2020 5. Weekly statistics for NHS Test and Trace (England): 7 January to 13 January 2021.
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|