Institutionalizing research capacity strengthening in LMICs: A systematic review and meta-synthesis

Author:

Vicente-Crespo MartaORCID,Agunbiade OjoORCID,Eyers John,Thorogood Margaret,Fonn SharonORCID

Abstract

Background: Evidence on effective strategies to ensure sustainability of research capacity strengthening interventions in low- and middle-income country (LMIC) institutions is lacking. This systematic review identified publications describing research capacity building programs and noted their effect, their contexts, and the mechanisms, processes and social actors employed in them. Methods: We searched online databases for the period 2011-2018. Inclusion criteria were that the publications 1) described the intervention; 2) were implemented in LMICs; 3) were based in, or relevant to, university staff or post docs; 4) aimed to improve research capacity; 5) aimed to effect change at the institutional level. Two reviewers screened titles, abstracts and full text in consecutive rounds, a third resolved disagreements. Two people extracted the data of each full text using a data extraction tool covering data relevant to our question. Results: In total 4052 citations were identified and 19 papers were included, which referred to 14 interventions. Only three interventions mentioned using a conceptual framework to develop their approach and none described using a theory of change to assess outcomes. The most frequent inputs described were some method of formal training, promotion of a research-conducive environment and establishment of research support systems. A range of outcomes were reported, most frequently an increased number of publications and proportion of staff with PhDs. When factors of success were discussed, this was attributed to a rigorous approach to implementation, adequate funding, and local buy-in. Those who mentioned sustainability linked it to availability of funds and local buy-in. The lack of a common lexicon and a framework against which to report outcomes made comparison between initiatives difficult. Conclusions: The reduced number of interventions that met the inclusion criteria suggests that programs should be well-described, evaluated systematically, and findings published so that the research capacity strengthening community can extract important lessons.

Funder

New Partnership for Africa's Development

Carnegie Corporation of New York

Ernest Oppenheimer Memorial Trust

Department for International Development, UK Government

African Academy of Sciences

University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg

African Population and Health Research Center

University of Southern California

Wellcome Trust

Styrelsen för Internationellt Utvecklingssamarbete

Alliance for Accelerating Excellence in Science in Africa

Publisher

F1000 Research Ltd

Reference42 articles.

1. Building capacity for public and population health research in Africa: The consortium for advanced research training in Africa (CARTA) model.;A Ezeh;Glob Health Action.,2010

2. Seven principles for strengthening research capacity in low- and middle-income countries: simple ideas in a complex world.;Essence (Downsview).,2014

3. Strengthening in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Rapid Evidence Assessment.;M Fosci,2019

4. A narrative review of health research capacity strengthening in low and middle-income countries: Lessons for conflict-affected areas.;G Bowsher;Global Health.,2019

5. Increasing collaborative research output between early-career health researchers in Africa: lessons from the CARTA fellowship program.;D Uwizeye;Glob Health Action.,2020

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3