Addressing the Gap in Research Methodologies Education in Pediatric Oncology in the Eastern Mediterranean Region

Author:

Saab Raya12ORCID,Santana Victor34,Obeid Anas1,Devidas Meenakshi3,Belgaumi Asim45ORCID,Bhakta Nickhill3ORCID,Naidu Paula3ORCID,Saha Vaskar67ORCID,Sultan Iyad8ORCID,Arora Ramandeep Singh9ORCID,Mukoka Lilly3,Jeha Sima34ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Children's Cancer Institute, Department of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon

2. Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA

3. Department of Global Pediatric Medicine, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN

4. Department of Oncology, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN

5. Department of Pediatrics, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan

6. Tata Translational Cancer Research Centre, Tata Medical Center, Kolkata, India

7. Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom

8. King Hussein Cancer Center, Amman, Jordan

9. Pediatric Oncology Disease Management Group, Max Super-Specialty Hospital, New Delhi, India

Abstract

PURPOSE Formal training in clinical research methodologies is limited in limited-resource countries. Through collaboration among high- and middle-resource settings and in response to an identified need verbalized by regional pediatric oncology practitioners, Pediatric Oncology East & Mediterranean Group and St Jude Global developed a workshop focused on capacity building in research skills. Here, we describe its structure, implementation, and early results. METHODS Leveraging virtual capabilities, the format included lectures and small group breakout exercise sessions, for 3 hours per day on 2 consecutive days per week for 2 consecutive weeks. Topics included basics of study design, introduction to health care statistics, research ethics, data registries, and scientific writing. Applicants were required to submit an abstract for a potential research project. Each breakout group selected one abstract for further development and presented the final version in a groupwide session. The participants' experience was evaluated through an online survey. RESULTS Attendance included 29 registrants from 12 countries and six disciplines. Each breakout group was assigned a themed category: cohort studies, clinical trials, or registries. Critical feedback from the breakout sessions helped strengthen the selected projects, which included a retrospective study, a prospective observational study, a prospective interventional study, and a registry proposal. After the workshop, participants were invited to further develop their original abstracts, and three proposals received additional mentoring, one of which was a multi-institutional prospective study that was subsequently submitted through the Pediatric Oncology East & Mediterranean Group network for implementation. The postworkshop survey revealed an overall highly positive experience, and feedback provided potential themes for future workshops. CONCLUSION This workshop demonstrated the potential for collaborative network partnerships in targeting research training gaps in pediatric oncology. Lessons learned will be applied to future workshops to strengthen research in limited-resource settings.

Publisher

American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)

Subject

Cancer Research,Oncology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3