An open toolkit for tracking open science partnership implementation and impact

Author:

Gold E. RichardORCID,Ali-Khan Sarah E.,Allen LizORCID,Ballell LluisORCID,Barral-Netto ManoelORCID,Carr David,Chalaud Damien,Chaplin SimonORCID,Clancy Matthew S.ORCID,Clarke Patricia,Cook-Deegan Robert,Dinsmore A. P.,Doerr Megan,Federer Lisa,Hill Steven A.,Jacobs Neil,Jean Antoine,Jefferson Osmat Azzam,Jones ChonnettiaORCID,Kahl Linda J.,Kariuki Thomas M.,Kassel Sophie N.,Kiley RobertORCID,Kittrie Elizabeth Robboy,Kramer Bianca,Lee Wen Hwa,MacDonald Emily,Mangravite Lara M.,Marincola Elizabeth,Mietchen Daniel,Molloy Jennifer C.,Namchuk Mark,Nosek Brian A.,Paquet Sébastien,Pirmez ClaudeORCID,Seyller AnnabelORCID,Skingle Malcolm,Spadotto S. Nicole,Staniszewska SophieORCID,Thelwall Mike

Abstract

Serious concerns about the way research is organized collectively are increasingly being raised. They include the escalating costs of research and lower research productivity, low public trust in researchers to report the truth, lack of diversity, poor community engagement, ethical concerns over research practices, and irreproducibility. Open science (OS) collaborations comprise of a set of practices including open access publication, open data sharing and the absence of restrictive intellectual property rights with which institutions, firms, governments and communities are experimenting in order to overcome these concerns. We gathered two groups of international representatives from a large variety of stakeholders to construct a toolkit to guide and facilitate data collection about OS and non-OS collaborations. Ultimately, the toolkit will be used to assess and study the impact of OS collaborations on research and innovation. The toolkit contains the following four elements: 1) an annual report form of quantitative data to be completed by OS partnership administrators; 2) a series of semi-structured interview guides of stakeholders; 3) a survey form of participants in OS collaborations; and 4) a set of other quantitative measures best collected by other organizations, such as research foundations and governmental or intergovernmental agencies. We opened our toolkit to community comment and input. We present the resulting toolkit for use by government and philanthropic grantors, institutions, researchers and community organizations with the aim of measuring the implementation and impact of OS partnership across these organizations. We invite these and other stakeholders to not only measure, but to share the resulting data so that social scientists and policy makers can analyse the data across projects.

Funder

Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation

Wellcome Trust

UK Research and Innovation

Publisher

F1000 Research Ltd

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Health Policy,Immunology and Microbiology (miscellaneous),Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology (miscellaneous),Medicine (miscellaneous)

Reference55 articles.

1. Motivating participation in open science by examining researcher incentives.;S Ali-Khan;eLife.,2017

2. Identifying the challenges in implementing open science [version 1; peer review: 2 approved].;S Ali-Khan;MNI Open Res.,2018a

3. Defining Success in Open Science [version 2; peer review: 2 approved].;S Ali-Khan;MNI Open Res.,2018b

4. The Public Face of Science,2017

5. ANDS Guide: Institutional policies and procedures,2017

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3