Abstract
As one of the most morphologically conservative branches of the Sino-Tibetan language family, most of the Rgyalrongic languages are still understudied and poorly understood, not to mention their vulnerable or endangered status. It is therefore important for available data of these languages to be made accessible. The lexical data sets the authors have assembled provide comparative word lists of 20 modern and medieval Rgyalrongic languages, consisting of word lists from fieldwork carried out by the first author and other colleagues as well as published word lists by other authors. In particular, data of the two Khroskyabs varieties were collected by the first author from 2011 to 2016. Cognate identification is based on the authors' expertise in Rgyalrong historical linguistics through application of the comparative method. We curated the data by conducting phonemic segmentation and partial cognate annotation. The data sets can be used by historical linguists interested in the etymology and the phylogeny of the languages in question, and they can use them to answer questions regarding individual word histories or the subgrouping of languages in this important branch of Sino-Tibetan.
Funder
Horizon 2020 Framework Programme
Horizon Europe Framework Programme
Irish Research Council
Reference44 articles.
1. Stem alternations in Puxi verb inflection: Toward validating the rGyalrongic subgroup in Qiangic.;J Sun;Lang Linguistics.,2000
2. Parallelisms in the verb morphology of Sidaba rGyalrong and Lavrung in rGyalrongic.;J Sun;Lang Linguistics.,2000
3. Dated language phylogenies shed light on the ancestry of Sino-Tibetan.;L Sagart;Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A.,2019
4. Tangut as a West Gyalrongic language.;Y Lai;Folia Linguistica Historica.,2020
5. Language-tree divergence times support the Anatolian theory of Indo-European origin.;R Gray;Nature.,2003