QUALITY ASSURANCE: A PRESSING PROBLEM FOR EDUCATION IN THE 21ST CENTURY

Author:

Almadani Khaled1,Reid Norman2,Rodrigues Susan3

Affiliation:

1. University of Dundee, Dundee, Scotland, UK

2. Universities of Dundee and Glasgow, Scotland, UK

3. University of Northumbria, Newcastle, England, UK

Abstract

Quality assurance in secondary schools (ages about 12-18) and in higher education has been a growth industry for many years, with all kinds of agencies being funded. With apparently endless growth in education at all levels, with insistent demands on more resources, the political pressures in ensuring value for money have increased. This study looks at what is meant by quality assurance, challenges some of the current procedures and points to some better ways forward for the 21st century. Specifically, it argues that quality assurance must focus on the key goals for education at each stage with the learner always at the focus of all procedures to assess quality. Finally, the study illustrates this approach by considering what 793 secondary students thought of their experiences at the point when they were almost completing their education journey in secondary schools in the Kingdom of Bahrain. The research aim is to show how focussing on the actual learners can identify key issues that need addressed to enrich education provision. These issues include the emphasising understanding and not memorisation, the need for more groupwork and dialogue, restoring the visual-spatial aspects of learning, re-thinking curriculum balance, and re-examining national examination systems. The most fundamental question of all is whether quality assurance has improved quality - a key issue for the 21st century? Key words: national assessment, nature of learning, quality assurance, understanding-memorisation.

Publisher

Scientia Socialis Ltd

Subject

Education

Reference40 articles.

1. Al-Ahmadi, F., Oraif, G. (2009). Working memory capacity, confidence and scientific thinking. Research in Science and Technological Education, 27(2), 225 - 243.

2. Al-Ahmadi, F., Reid, N. (2011). Scientific Thinking - Can it be Taught? Journal of Science Education, (in press).

3. Al-Shibli, A. A. S. (2003). A study of science student teachers perceptions of learning in the education colleges in the Sultanate of Oman. PhD Thesis, Glasgow University of Glasgow.

4. Aspin, D. N., Chapman, J. D., Wilkison, V. R. (1994). Quality Schooling: a Pragmatic Approach to Some Current Problems,Topics and Issues, London: Cassell.

5. Avalos, B., Assael, J. (2006). Moving from resistance to agreement: The case of the Chilean teacher performance evaluation, International Journal of Educational Research, 45(4-5), 254-266.

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Sfidat në punën e koordinatorëve të cilësisë në shkolla;Kërkime Pedagogjike;2024-06-15

2. Development of Internal Quality Assurance Equal Education;Proceedings of the Unima International Conference on Social Sciences and Humanities (UNICSSH 2022);2023

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3