STUDENTS’ PERCEPTIONS OF REAL AND VIRTUAL FIELD WORK IN BIOLOGY
-
Published:2011-12-15
Issue:1
Volume:37
Page:98-108
-
ISSN:2538-7111
-
Container-title:Problems of Education in the 21st Century
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:PEC
Author:
Puhek Miro1, Perše Matej2, Šorgo Andrej2
Affiliation:
1. Sinergise, Ltd., Ljubljana, Slovenia 2. University of Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia
Abstract
The outdoor education is a method of learning with the exposure to (not exclusively) the natural environment that combines all human senses. Students tend to acknowledge a very positive effect of this kind of learning. It is easier and more memorable to connect the theory with practice, when they see things in nature, rather than to just hear about them in the classroom. Despite its popularity, teachers face various obstacles when they take their students outdoors. Although the outdoor education is included in the Slovenian primary and lower secondary school curriculum, the percentage is not high enough, which depends on various reasons. Teachers defined lack of time, suitability of area around the school, not enough instruments for field work and to expanded curriculum as the main reasons for not including field work in the classes. Some of these obstacles could be solved by implementation of information and communication technology (ICT) into the biology and ecology classes.
In this research the results of 192 students’ point of view on the importance of field work, obstacles of that kind of work and the ICT as a solution to support or replace the real field works are presented. All questioned students were prospective teachers, so sooner or later majority of them will face issues connected to the field work and possibilities to solve them with the help of ICT.
Key words: biology education, field work, ICT, obstacles, virtual field trips.
Publisher
Scientia Socialis Ltd
Reference38 articles.
1. Barker, S., Slingsby, D., & Tilling, S. (2002). Teaching biology outside the classroom. Is it heading for extinction? A report on biology fieldwork in the 14 – 19 curriculum. FSC Occasional Publication 72. Shrewsbury, UK: Field Studies Council and British Ecological Society. 2. Bergin, D. A., Anderson, A. H., Molnar, T., Baumgartner, R., Mitchell, S., Korper, S., Curley, A., & Rottmann, J. (2007). Providing remote accessible field trips (RAFT): an evaluation study. Computers in Human Behaviour, 23(1), 192-219. 3. Bonnel, W., Fletcher, K., & Wingate, A. (2007). Integrating Geriatric Resources into the Classroom: A Virtual Tour Example. Geriatric Nursing, 28(5), 301-305. 4. Boyle, T., Stevens-Wood, B., Feng, Z., & Tikka, A. (1996). Structured learning in a virtual environment. Computers Education, 26 (1-3), 41-49. 5. Carleton-Hug, A., & Hug, J. W. (2010). Challenges and opportunities for evaluating environmental education programs. Evaluation and Program Planning, 32(2), 159-164.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|