Affiliation:
1. Sinergise, Laboratory for Geographical Information Systems, Ltd., Ljubljana, Slovenia
2. University of Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia
Abstract
In the present research the results of 288 lower secondary schools in-service teachers, 192 undergraduate students and 211 lower secondary school students from Slovenia were analysed in terms of importance of fieldwork and the information and communication technology (ICT) as a solution for supporting or replacing fieldwork itself. The main aim of the analysis was to compare the points of view in all stages: from students to teachers. Also, comparisons with international data obtained as part of TIMSS and TALIS studies were made. The analysis showed that participants tend to acknowledge a very positive effect to this kind of learning, despite the obstacles connected therewith. A comparison of the usage of ICT at home and in the school environment, as predicted, showed that students tend to be more digitally competent than their teachers. Also, the statistically significant difference pointed out that older teachers are less favourable towards ICT in education than their younger colleagues. Key words: biology education, information communication technology, lower secondary education, teaching/learning strategies, virtual field trip.
Reference42 articles.
1. Alexander, P. A., & Winne, P. H. (Ed.) (2006). Handbook of Educational Psychology. New Jersey: Lawrance Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
2. van den Beemt, A., Akkerman, S., & Simons, R. J. (2011). Considering young people's motives for interactive media use. Educational Research Review, 6 (1), 55-66.
3. Chan, B. K. K., Hodgkiss, I. J., & Chan, R. Y. P. (2002). A distributed learning model for Freshwater Ecology practical classes. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 18, 309-319.
4. Cooper, J. (2006). The digital divide: the special case of gender. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 22, 320-334.
5. Corno, L., & Mandinach, E. (2004). What have we learned about student engagement in the past twenty years. In D. McInerney & S. van Etten (Eds.), Big theories revisited (pp. 299–328). 9–9 Greenwich, CT: Information Publishing Age.