RECONCEPTUALIZING AND FIELD TESTING THE SCIENTIFIC LITERACY FRAMEWORK BY EXPLORING THE ASPECT OF SCIENTIFIC LITERACY IN TURKISH SCIENCE CURRICULUM

Author:

Cansiz Mustafa1,Cansiz Nurcan1

Affiliation:

1. Artvin Çoruh University, Turkey

Abstract

The aim of this research was twofold. The first aim was to revise the existing scientific literacy framework developed by Boujaoude in accordance with the current literature about scientific literacy. The second aim was to explore how the aspects of scientific literacy were reflected in the Turkish science curriculum using the revised framework. The impact of science and technology on environment resulted in the need for both scientifically and environmentally literate individuals and therefore, any framework examining scientific literacy should include the interaction between science, technology, society, and environment as an aspect. Moreover, a new aspect was suggested for the framework, the affective side of science, considering the affective outcomes of science education. Finally, the science curriculum from grades 3 to 8 was analyzed using the revised framework. Results showed that the revisions on the framework resulted in a more rigorous framework which evaluates scientific literacy more precisely. Moreover, the results about the analysis of science curriculum indicated that the knowledge of science and the investigative nature of science were reflected in the objectives of the curriculum more than other aspects. The results and implications were discussed. Keywords: affective domain, document analysis, science curriculum, science education, scientific literacy framework.

Publisher

Scientia Socialis Ltd

Subject

Education

Reference34 articles.

1. Aikenhead, G. S. (2003). STS education: A rose by any other name. In R. Cross (Ed.), A vision for science education: Responding to the work of Peter J. Fensham (pp. 59 – 75). New York: Routledge Press.

2. Anderson, L. W. (2010). Taxonomies of objectives and learning. In C. Kridel (Ed.). Encyclopedia of curriculum studies (pp. 839-841). London: Sage Publications.

3. Bayliss, V. (1999). Opening minds: Education for the 21st century. The final report of the RSA project redefining the curriculum. London: Royal Society of Arts.

4. Behar-Horenstein, L. S. (2010). Objectives in curriculum planning. In C. Kridel (Ed.) Encyclopedia of curriculum studies (pp. 615-616). London: Sage Publications.

5. BouJaoude, S. (2002). Balance of scientific literacy themes in science curricula: The case of

Cited by 7 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3