LEARNING APPROACHES TO APPLYING ROBOTICS IN SCIENCE EDUCATION

Author:

Altin Heilo1,Pedaste Margus1

Affiliation:

1. University of Tartu, Estonia

Abstract

The methodology and ideas behind educational robotics arise from the 1960s, when the first hardware platforms together with computers were used in research studies in schools. Since the 1990s, the market for educational robotics has grown, and there are many solutions available to use in schools. Despite a wide variety of platform approaches for using robots in education, they are still based on ideas that are decades old. This study evaluates different approaches used nowadays to teach with robots. Problem-based, constructionist, and competition-based learning are identified as the most common uses of robots under observation. Each approach is analysed qualitatively based on the published literature. Each has positive and negative properties; though none have been studied thoroughly using quantitative methods. Results indicate that all these approaches are used in schools with robots interdisciplinary. The current reasons for using robots are based mostly on teachers’ and students’ impressions. However, robotics can be seen as a “tool” to create many approaches to science education, such as inquiry learning and problem solving. Key words: constructionism, constructivism, educational robotics, inquiry learning, LEGO Mindstorms, problem solving.

Publisher

Scientia Socialis Ltd

Subject

Education

Reference43 articles.

1. Abiyev, R., Ibrahim, D., & Erin, B. (2010). EDURobot: An Educational computer simulation program for navigation of mobile robots in the presence of obstacles. International Journal of Engineering Education, 26 (1), 18-29.

2. Alimisis, D. (2012). Robotics in Education & education in robotics: Shifting focus from technology to pedagogy. Paper presented at the Robotics in Education, Praha.

3. Alimisis, D., Frangou, S., & Papanikolaou, K. (2009). A constructivist methodology for teacher training in educational robotics: the TERECoP Course in Greece through trainees’ eyes. Icalt: 2009 Ieee International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, 24-28.

4. Arlegui, J., & Pina, A. (2009). Teacher training in the scientific field through robotic activities. Paper presented at the Lessons Learnt from the TERECoP Project and New Pathways into Educational Robotics across Europe Athens.

5. Barbero, A., Demo, B., & Vaschetto, F. (2011). A contribution to the discussion on informatics and robotics in secondary schools. Paper presented at the Proceedings of 2nd international conference on Robotics in education (RiE 2011). INNOC–Austrian Society for Innovative Computer Sciences, Vienna, Austria, September.

Cited by 32 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3