Affiliation:
1. National University of Education, Ecuador
2. International University of Ecuador, Ecuador
3. University of the Armed Forces, Ecuador
Abstract
University research is the way in which lecturers can perceive, analyze and be illustrated about unknown topics or something that has been omitted and that is why it is important and is the key in the academic researcher´s life, the gathering of information, the analysis and the search for a solution to an existing or detected problem. This research includes three phases: the first, where the search, collection and data analysis is proposed; the second, where models of teacher formation and theorization are included and the third, where the final idea of formation of university researchers and lecturers is proposed. This research was developed from a qualitative perspective, since it is implemented in an epistemic conceptualization that corresponds to its nature, highlighting the interest of deepening the intuition of the object research. As key informants, the participation of 15 (fifteen) lecturers from different universities of Ecuador is highlighted. The constant comparison of theories and grounded theory was applied for the analysis of the subtracted data, in order to make a theoretical approach through the emerging categories and sub-categories, through the operating software Atlas.ti version 8; with the aim to contribute to the theoretical and methodological basis. The subcategories were derived: professional teaching function and novel teaching profile. The conclusions mention the idea or model of formation for higher education teaching staff. It also mentions the importance of improving the formation of lecturers through scientific research to promote knowledge and strategies that require the need to theorize, produce and increase the level of thinking.
Keywords: continuous research, complex thinking, educational innovation, educational theory, formation of teaching staff, university education.
Reference38 articles.
1. Calduch, R. (2014). Métodos y técnicas de investigación internacional [International research methods and techniques]. Madrid: Universidad Complutense de Madrid.
2. Calle, L. (2018). Educación Superior: la alfabetización en géneros discursivos [Higher education: Literacy in discursive generes]. Educação & Realidade, 43(2), 629-651. doi: 10.1590/2175-623665114.
3. Calvo, M. (2019). Pensamiento complejo y transdisciplina [Complex thinking and transdiscipline]. Sophia, colección de Filosofía de la Educación, 26(1), 307-326. doi: http://doi.org/10.17163/soph.n26.2019.09.
4. Chacón, A. (2012). Andragogy as a discipline propelling knowledge in higher education. Educare, 16(1), 15-26. Retrieved from: http://www.revistas.una.ac.cr/index.php/EDUCARE/article/view/3729.
5. Charmaz, K. (2010). Constructing Grounded Theory. A practicel guide through qualitative analysis. Washington DC: Sage.
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献