Transcutaneous Versus Blood Gas Measurement of CO2 in Neonates: Variation by Method and Racial Group

Author:

Reichert Lara1,Scott Samantha2,Dugan Taylor2,Setzen Sean2,Feustel Paul2ORCID,Pezzano Chad1

Affiliation:

1. Albany Medical Center

2. Albany Medical College

Abstract

Abstract

Objective: Transcutaneous carbon dioxide monitors are used to non-invasively monitor blood CO2 levels in acute care settings, however, their accuracy has been shown to vary. We studied the correlation between transcutaneous monitors and arterial, capillary, and venous CO2 blood gas measurements in neonates. We also sought to examine any variability across different racial groups. Design and Setting: Retrospective chart review at a level 4 NICU conducted at Albany Medical Center, Albany, New York, USA. Patients: Twenty-four NICU patients who underwent transcutaneous CO2 monitoring were studied over a 1-year period. Interventions: None Measurements and Main Results: Arterial, venous, and capillary CO2 measurements that occurred within one hour of transcutaneous carbon dioxide monitor measurement were collected. Arterial measurements maintained the highest degree of difference from transcutaneous values (degree of bias 9.3 torr). Venous monitoring and transcutaneous monitoring yielded the lowest degree of bias (-.46 torr), though this sample size was the lowest of our blood gas types. Capillary point-of-care testing values yielded an intermediate bias (4.12 torr). Greater agreement existed when blood gas PCO2 values increased over time for a given patient. No difference in the amount of bias was appreciated between racial groups. Conclusions: Transcutaneous CO2 monitoring in neonatal patients is within the accepted manufacturer range of error when compared to blood gas analysis, and can be considered an accurate, noninvasive method of monitoring. Capillary point of care analysis is an efficient means of confirming transcutaneous monitoring and had better agreement than the more invasive arterial gases.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3