Affiliation:
1. Menzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University
2. Menzies School of Health Research: Charles Darwin University
3. Djalkiri Foundation, Northern Territory
4. Charles Darwin University Northern Institute
5. Charles Darwin University
6. Northern Territory Department of Health and Community Services: Northern Territory Department of Health
Abstract
Abstract
Background
The Communicate Study is a partnership project which aims to transform the culture of healthcare systems to achieve excellence in culturally safe care for First Nations people. It responds to the ongoing impact of colonisation which results in First Nations peoples experiencing adverse outcomes of hospitalisation in Australia’s Northern Territory. In this setting, the majority of healthcare users are First Nations peoples but the majority of healthcare providers are not. Our hypotheses are that strategies to ensure cultural safety can be effectively taught, systems can become culturally safe, and that the provision of culturally safe healthcare in first languages will improve experiences and outcomes of hospitalisation.
Methods
We will implement a multi-component intervention at three hospitals over four years. The main intervention components are: cultural safety training called ‘Ask the Specialist Plus’ which incorporates a locally-developed, purpose-built podcast; developing a community of practice in cultural safety; and improving access to and uptake of Aboriginal language interpreters. Intervention components are informed by the ‘Behaviour Change Wheel’ and address a supply-demand model for interpreters. The philosophical underpinnings are Critical Race Theory, Freirean pedagogy and cultural safety. There are co-primary qualitative and quantitative outcome measures: cultural safety, as experienced by First Nations peoples at participating hospitals, and proportion of admitted First Nations patients who self-discharge. Qualitative measures of patient and provider experience, and patient-provider interactions, will be examined through interviews and observational data. Quantitative outcomes (documentation of language; uptake of interpreters (booked and completed); proportion of admissions ending in self-discharge; unplanned re-admission; hospital length of stay; costs and cost benefits of interpreter use) will be measured using time-series analysis. Continuous quality improvement will use data in a participatory way to motivate change. Program evaluation will assess reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation and maintenance (‘RE-AIM’).
Discussion
The intervention components are innovative, sustainable and have been successfully piloted. Refinement and scale up through this project have the potential to transform First Nations patients’ experiences of care and health outcomes.
Trial registration
Registered with ClinicalTrials.gov Protocol Record 2008644
Publisher
Research Square Platform LLC
Reference59 articles.
1. Productivity Commission AG. Closing the Gap Annual Data Compilation Report https://www.pc.gov.au/closing-the-gap-data/annual-data-report
2. Social determinants and the health of Indigenous Australians;Marmot M;Med J Australia,2011
3. Low uptake of Aboriginal interpreters in healthcare: exploration of current use in Australia's Northern Territory;Ralph AP;BMC Health Serv Res,2017
4. From "stuck" to satisfied: Aboriginal people's experience of culturally safe care with interpreters in a Northern Territory hospital;Kerrigan V;BMC Health Serv Res,2021
5. Mithen V, Kerrigan V, Dhurrkay G, Morgan T, Keilor N, Castillon C, Hefler M, Ralph AP. Aboriginal patient and interpreter perspectives on the delivery of culturally safe hospital-based care.Health Promot J Austr2020.