Trainee versus supervisor viewpoints of entrustment: using artificial intelligence language models to detect thematic differences and potential biases

Author:

Gin Brian C.1,Cate Olle ten2,O'Sullivan Patricia S.1,Boscardin Christy K.1

Affiliation:

1. University of California, San Francisco

2. University Medical Center Utrecht

Abstract

Abstract The entrustment framework redirects assessment from considering only trainees’ competence to decision-making about their readiness to perform clinical tasks independently. Since trainees’ and supervisors’ viewpoints both contribute to entrustment decisions, we examined how they may differentially prioritize factors that determine trust, and how biases may influence this process. Under a social constructivist paradigm, we developed large language model (LLM) based approach to examine feedback dialogs (N = 24187, each with an associated entrustment rating) between student trainees and their precepting supervisors. Using LLM-assisted factor analysis, we compared how trainees and supervisors documented similar types of clinical tasks by identifying factors correlated with entrustment ratings. Supervisors’ factors were dominated by skills related to patient presentations, while trainees’ factors captured a wider range of themes, including both clinical performance and personal qualities. To examine bias, we developed a gender-neutral LLM to measure sentiment in feedback narratives. On average, trainees used more negative language (5.3% lower probability of positive sentiment, p < 0.05) compared to supervisors, while assigning themselves a higher entrustment rating (+ 0.08 on a 1–4 scale, p < 0.05). Trainees’ documentation reflected more positive sentiment in the case of male trainees (+ 1.3%, p < 0.05) and of trainees underrepresented in medicine (+ 1.3%, p < 0.05). Importantly, entrustment ratings themselves did not appear to reflect these biases, neither when documented by the trainee nor supervisor. As such, bias appeared to affect trainee self-perceptions more than the degree of entrustment they experienced. Mitigating these biases is nonetheless important because they may affect trainees’ assimilation into their roles and formation of trusting relationships.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference63 articles.

1. Abadi, M., Agarwal, A., Barham, P., Brevdo, E., Chen, Z., Citro, C., Corrado, G. S., Davis, A., Dean, J., Devin, M., Ghemawat, S., Goodfellow, I., Harp, A., Irving, G., Isard, M., Jozefowicz, R., Jia, Y., Kaiser, L., Kudlur, M., & Zheng, X. (2015). TensorFlow: Large-Scale Machine Learning on Heterogeneous Distributed Systems. https://www.tensorflow.org/about/bib.

2. Agarwal, B., & Nayak, R. (2020). Deep Learning-Based Approaches for Sentiment Analysis (B. Agarwal, R. Nayak, N. Mittal, & S. Patnaik, Eds.). Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-1216-2.

3. BERT: a sentiment analysis odyssey;Alaparthi S;Journal of Marketing Analytics,2021

4. Gender bias in resident evaluations: Natural language processing and competency evaluation;Andrews J;Medical Education,2021

5. Investigating Gender Bias in BERT;Bhardwaj R;Cognitive Computation,2021

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3