Contextualizing abortion opinions in Kenya: A vignette-based national survey

Author:

Ushie Boniface Ayanbekongshie1,Akuku Isaiah G2,Mutuku Esther2,Juma Kenneth2

Affiliation:

1. Beshi King Development Services

2. African Population and Health Research Center

Abstract

Abstract

Objectives: Abortion is a deeply controversial public health issue, evoking diverse opinions regardless of the legal context. Policymaking on abortion often relies on generalized public opinion surveys lacking contextual nuance. We examined public opinions in Kenya towards abortion in circumstances of rape, health risks, and fetal anomalies. Methods: We used a nationally representative sample of 8,942 adults in Kenya, drawn from a database of 12 million phone users in Kenya. Using a two-stage sampling approach with random digit dialing, the sample was stratified by location, sex, and age to facilitate proportional representation. We utilized a questionnaire adopted from a vignette-based tool, with scenarios describing threats to the life or health of the pregnant woman, fetal anomaly, and rape. The tool had 14 opinion statements corresponding to each vignette and three questions on whether respondents support women’s abortion rights in these circumstances. Trained interviewers administered the questionnaire through telephone between October and November 2022. We employed multivariable-adjusted linear regression to assess factors influencing abortion opinions. Results: Most respondents (>61%) favored women’s right to abortion when pregnancies threaten their life or health, compared to 29% and 44% who supported it in cases of rape or fetal anomaly. There was significant support for abortion to be performed by the public health system, compared to abortion as a woman’s right. Generally, the liberal constructs had higher mean scores than the conservative constructs, and the women’s reproductive autonomy had the highest mean score (3.44±1.07) among all the constructs, suggesting widespread agreement that abortion decisions should rest solely with the pregnant woman. Conversely, among conservative constructs, the sanctity of life had the highest mean score (2.40±0.89), showing a strong belief in the sanctity of life among abortion opponents. Conclusion: Abortion opinions vary depending on the circumstances, with significant support for legal abortion under diverse contexts. Public policy should reflect these contextualized opinions and address specific impediments to support, especially towards legalization as a public health, gender equality and human rights imperative.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3