Large Language Models in Randomized Controlled Trials Design

Author:

Liu Nan1ORCID,Jin Liyuan1,Ong Jasmine Chiat Ling2ORCID,Kabilan Elangovan3,Ke Yuhe4,Pyle Alexandra2,Ting Daniel5ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Duke-NUS Medical School

2. Singapore General Hospital

3. Singapore National Eye Centre, Singapore Eye Research Institute

4. Department of Anesthesiology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore

5. Singapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore National Eye Centre

Abstract

Abstract

We investigate the potential of large language models (LLMs) in enhancing the design of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to address challenges related to generalizability, recruitment diversity, and failure rates. We selected 20 RCTs for analysis, including both completed and ongoing studies, with a focus on their design aspects such as eligibility criteria, recruitment strategies, interventions, and outcomes measurement. Our evaluation revealed that LLMs can design RCT with 72% overall accuracy. Qualitative assessments indicated that LLM-generated designs were clinically aligned, scoring above 2 on a Likert scale across safety, accuracy, objectivity, pragmatism, inclusivity, and diversity domains. The results highlight LLM's capability to avoid critical safety and ethical issues, suggesting its potential as an assistive tool in RCT design to improve generalizability and reduce failure rates. However, expert oversight and regulatory measures are emphasized as essential to ensure patient safety and ethical conduct in clinical research.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference40 articles.

1. behalf of the POLAR O. Challenging issues in randomised controlled trials;Nichol A;Injury,2010

2. Diversity in clinical trials: an opportunity and imperative for community engagement;Gray DM;The Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology,2021

3. Stensland KD, DePorto K, Ryan J, et al. Estimating the rate and reasons of clinical trial failure in urologic oncology. Elsevier; 2021:154–160.

4. Estimation of clinical trial success rates and related parameters;Wong CH;Biostatistics,2019

5. Pretorius S, Grignolo A. Phase III trial failures: Costly, but preventable. 2016;

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3