Incomplete filling of spray-dried K2EDTA evacuated blood tubes: impact on measuring routine hematological parameters on Sysmex XN-10

Author:

Lippi GiuseppeORCID,Dima Francesco,Tosi Marco,Carpenè Giovanni,Celegon Giovanni,Favaloro Emmanuel J.ORCID,Salvagno Gian LucaORCID

Abstract

Abstract Background. Because there is little published evidence on the effects of incomplete filling of K2EDTA evacuated blood tubes on routine hematological testing, this original study aimed to provide updated information on this preanalytical aspect. Materials and Methods. The study population consisted of 17 ostensibly healthy volunteers. Blood was drawn by venipuncture with a 10 mL syringe and dispensed in varying amounts (0.2, 0.5, 1.0, 2.0, and 3.0 ml) into 3.0 mL blood tubes containing spray-dried 5.4 mg K2EDTA. All tubes were gently mixed and used to perform routine hematology tests on the Sysmex XN-10. Clinically significant variations were defined when the limits of desirable specifications of bias derived from biologic variation were exceeded. Results. The desirable bias was exceeded in 33% filled tubes (1.0 mL) for hematocrit and MCV (increased values) and for MCHC (decreased values), while it was exceeded in 17% filled tubes (0.5 mL) for hemoglobin, hematocrit and MCV (increased values), and for MCHC (decreased values). Finally, the variation of values was higher than the desirable bias for RBC, hemoglobin, hematocrit and MCV (increase), and for MCHC and MPV (decrease) in 7% filled tubes (0.2 mL). No clinically significant variations were observed in tubes filled up to 67% of their nominal volume (i.e., 2.0 mL). Conclusions. Consideration should be given to reject spray-dried K2EDTA blood tubes that contain a blood volume < 67% of the nominal fill volume, as biased laboratory data in these samples may interfere with clinical decision making and care management.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3