Introducing Extended Consultations for Patients with Severe Mental Illness in General Practice. Results from the SOFIA Feasibility Study

Author:

Jønsson ABR1,Martiny FHJ2,Søndergaard MK3,Brodersen JB4,Due TD5,Nielsen MH4,Bakkedal C4,Bardram JE6,Bissenbakker K4,Christensen I7,Doherty K6,Kjellberg P7,Mercer SW8,Reventlow S4,Rozing MP4,Møller A4

Affiliation:

1. The Section of General Practice and Research Unit for General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Center for Health and Society, Department of People and Technology, Roskilde University, Denmark

2. The Section of General Practice and Research Unit for General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen , Center for Social Medicine, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark

3. The Research Unit for General Practice, University of Southern Denmark

4. The Section of General Practice and Research Unit for General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen

5. The Section of General Practice and Research Unit for General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Primary Health Care, Region Zealand

6. Department of Health Technology, Technical University Denmark

7. Danish National Centre for Social Research

8. Usher Institute, College of Medicine and Veterinary Medicine, University of Edinburgh

Abstract

Abstract Background The SOFIA intervention aims to improve life expectancy and quality of life for patients with severe mental illness (SMI). The complex intervention was co-designed with relevant stakeholders and consists of an extended consultation in general practice, focusing on a patient-centred and structured care approach. We tested its feasibility and assessed the clinical content of extended consultations as preparation for a larger randomized pilot study. Methods The study was a one-armed feasibility study. We planned that seven general practices in northern Denmark would introduce extended consultations with their patients with SMI for six months. Patients with SMI were identified using practice medical records and screened for eligibility by the patients’ general practitioner (GP). Data were collected using case report forms filled out by practice personnel and via qualitative methods, including observations of consultations, individual semi-structured interviews, a focus group with GPs, and informal conversations with patients and general practice staff. Results Five general practices employing seven GPs participated in the study, which was terminated 3 ½ month ahead of schedule due to the COVID-19 pandemic. General practices contacted 57 patients with SMI. In total, 38 patients (67%) attended an extended consultation, which led to a change in patients’ somatic health care plan in 82% of consultations. The conduct of the extended consultations varied between GPs and diverged from the SOFIA protocol. Nonetheless, GPs found that the extended consultations were feasible and, in most cases, perceived as beneficial for the patient group. Most patients also perceived an extended consultation as beneficial. Discussion Our findings suggest that extended consultations for patients with SMI in general practice are feasible and perceived as beneficial by GPs and patients. Larger studies with a longer follow-up period could help to assess the long-term effects and the best implementation strategies for introducing extended consultations for patients with SMI in general practice. Conclusion Introducing extended consultations for patients with SMI in the Danish general practice setting was feasible and acceptable to patients and GPs. Extended consultations are well-suited for eliciting patients’ values and preferences and likely lead to changes in most patients’ somatic health care plans.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference52 articles.

1. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki. Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects;World Medical A;Bulletin of the World Health Organization,2001

2. Preparing raw clinical data for publication: guidance for journal editors, authors, and peer reviewers;Hrynaszkiewicz I;Trials,2010

3. Physical illness in patients with severe mental disorders. I. Prevalence, impact of medications and disparities in health care;Hert M;World Psychiatry,2011

4. World Health, O., Helping people with severe mental disorders live longer and healthier lives: policy brief. 2017, World Health Organization: Geneva.

5. Outcomes of Nordic mental health systems: life expectancy of patients with mental disorders;Wahlbeck K;Br J Psychiatry,2011

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3