Challenges in reaching patients with severe mental illness for trials in general practice—a convergent mixed methods study based on the SOFIA pilot trial

Author:

Tranberg KatrineORCID,Due Tina Drud,Rozing Maarten,Jønsson Alexandra Brandt Ryborg,Kousgaard Marius Brostrøm,Møller Anne

Abstract

Abstract Background Patients with severe mental illness (SMI) die prematurely due to undetected and inadequate treatment of somatic illnesses. The SOFIA pilot study was initiated to mend this gap in health inequity. However, reaching patients with SMI for intervention research has previously proven difficult. This study aimed to investigate the recruitment of patients with SMI for the SOFIA pilot study in 2021. Methods We used a mixed-method convergent design. The qualitative material comprised 20 interviews with general practitioners (GPs) and staff, during patient recruitment. The quantitative data consisted of process data on baseline characteristics, GPs reported reasons for excluding a patient, reported reasons for patients declining participation, and registered data from a Danish population of patients with SMI. We used thematic analysis in the qualitative analysis and descriptive statistics for the quantitative analysis. Pillar integration was used for integrating the material. Results Our findings show that selection bias occurred in the pilot study. We describe four main themes based on the integrated analysis that highlights selection issues: (1) poor data quality and inconsistency in defining severity definitions troubled identification and verification, (2) protecting the patient and maintaining practice efficiency, (3) being familiar with the patient was important for a successful recruitment, and (4) in hindsight, the GPs questioned whether the target population was reached. Conclusions In the light of theories of professions and street-level bureaucracy, we find that the main drivers of the patient selection bias occurring in the SOFIA pilot study were that 1) GPs and staff mended eligibility criteria to protect certain patients and/or to minimize workload and maintain efficiency in the practice 2) the data from the GP record systems and the digital assessment tool to assist recruitment was not optimal. Interventions targeting this patient group should carefully consider the recruitment strategy with a particular focus on professionals’ discretionary practices and information technology pitfalls. Trial registration The pilot trial protocol was registered on the 5th of November 2020. The registration number is NCT04618250.

Funder

Novo Nordisk Fonden

Royal Library, Copenhagen University Library

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Medicine (miscellaneous)

Reference39 articles.

1. Rozing MP, Jonsson A, Koster-Rasmussen R, et al. The SOFIA pilot trial: a cluster-randomized trial of coordinated, co-produced care to reduce mortality and improve quality of life in people with severe mental illness in the general practice setting. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2021;7(1):168. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40814-021-00906-z.PubMedPMID:34479646. PubMed PMID: 34479646; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC8413362.

2. Howard L, de Salis I, Tomlin Z, et al. Why is recruitment to trials difficult? An investigation into recruitment difficulties in an RCT of supported employment in patients with severe mental illness. Contemp Clin Trials. 2009;30(1):40–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cct.2008.07.007.

3. Rendell JM, Merritt RD, Geddes JR. Incentives and disincentives to participation by clinicians in randomised controlled trials. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007;2007(2):Mr000021. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.MR000021.pub3. PubMed PMID: 17443636; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC7437389 conflicts of interest. eng.

4. Chang CK, Hayes RD, Perera G, et al. Life expectancy at birth for people with serious mental illness and other major disorders from a secondary mental health care case register in London. PLoS One. 2011;6(5):e19590. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0019590. PubMed PMID: 21611123; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3097201.

5. de Mooij LD, Kikkert M, Theunissen J, et al. Dying too soon: excess mortality in severe mental illness. Front Psychiatry. 2019;10:855. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00855. PubMed PMID: 31920734; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC6918821.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3