Affiliation:
1. University of Turin Department of Molecular Biotechnology and Health Sciences: Universita degli Studi di Torino Dipartimento di Biotecnologie Molecolari e Scienze per la Salute
2. Heidelberg University Medical Faculty Mannheim: Universitat Heidelberg Medizinische Fakultat Mannheim
3. College of Medicine Nursing Midwifery and Health Sciences: National University of Ireland Galway College of Medicine Nursing and Health Sciences
4. National University of Ireland Galway College of Medicine Nursing and Health Sciences
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Extracellular vesicles (EV) are considered a cell-free alternative to mesenchymal stromal cell (MSC) therapy. Numerous reports describe the efficacy of EV in conferring immunomodulation and promoting angiogenesis, yet others report these activities to be conveyed in EV-free bioproducts. We hypothesized that this discrepancy may depend either on the method of isolation or rather the relative impact of the individual bioactive components within the MSC secretome.
Methods
To answer this question, we performed an inter-laboratory study evaluating EV generated from adipose stromal cells (ASC) by either sequential ultracentrifugation (UC) or size-exclusion chromatography (SEC). The effect of both EV preparations on immunomodulation and angiogenesis in vitro was compared to that of the whole secretome and of the EV-free protein fraction after SEC isolation.
Results
In the current study, neither the EV preparations, the secretome or the protein fraction were efficacious in inhibiting mitogen-driven T cell proliferation – highlighting the need for direct cell-to-cell contact. However, EV generated by SEC stimulated macrophage phagocytic activity to a similar extent as the secretome. In turn, tube formation and wound healing were strongly promoted by the ASC secretome and protein fraction, but not by EV. Within the secretome/protein fraction, VEGF was identified as a potential driver of angiogenesis, and was absent in both EV preparations.
Conclusions
Our data indicate that the effects of MSCs on immunomodulation and angiogenesis are EV-independent and rely on direct cell-to-cell contact or on the secretion of soluble factors, respectively. Specific MSC-EV effects need to be dissected for their use as cell-free therapeutics.
Publisher
Research Square Platform LLC