Did faculty training on item construction and peer review improve the quality of MCQs? An observational study in a medical school

Author:

Hassan Bahaeldin1,Alamri Abdulaziz A.1,Alzahrani Hassan A.1,Ahmad Mohammad Tauheed1,Shati Ayed A.1,Patel Ayyub A.1,Khan Muhammad1,Elfaki Omer A2

Affiliation:

1. King Khalid University

2. Al Rayan College of Medicine

Abstract

Abstract Background: multiple choice questions (MCQs) test is the most popular assessment tool that used in medical schools, faculty training on construction of MCQs and peer review are the main factors that contributing to have a good quality MCQs test. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of these two factors on the quality of MCQs test. Methods: an extensive training program was conducted for the staff members who participated in teaching and assessment of undergraduate medical students of clinical biochemistry and psychiatric courses during the academic year 2020-2021. Post-test item analysis was used to compare pre-training with post-training item analysis parameters. The Chi-square test was applied, the level of significance was 5%. Results: The difficulty index showed great improvement in the number of items which lie in the acceptable range of difficulty from 16% and 25% before the training program, to 61% and 42% after the training program for psychiatry and clinical biochemistry courses respectively. This is significantly different (P<0.05). In psychiatry course the number of questions with negative discrimination power decreased from 36% before training program to 10% after it (P value >0.05). No significant improvement was noticed in biochemistry course regarding this aspect. The percentage of test items where all distracters were functioning was increased from 11% to 41% in psychiatry course (P value=0.0002), and from 12% to 46%, in biochemistry course (P value=0.0001). This is a significant improvement. Reliability after the training program and peer review processes also increased in both courses. However, this is not statistically significant. Conclusions: A dramatic improvement was observed in the quality of MCQs after peer review and training program. We recommend adopting training program on construction of MCQs to be mandatory for all medical school staff members in Saudi Arabia.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3