Misinformation in Conversations about Ticks and Tick-borne Disease in Public Facebook Groups

Author:

McDonald Kaitlin M.1,Warzecha Haley1,McDonald Emily M.2,May Maxwell Le3,Cottingham Kathryn L.1

Affiliation:

1. Dartmouth College

2. United States Food and Drug Administration

3. Brown University

Abstract

Abstract

Background Health-related misinformation on social media can negatively impact public health outcomes. Effective interventions to combat misinformation require an understanding of the underlying topics and their associated misperceptions. Ticks and the pathogens they carry are increasing worldwide, raising concerns about the disease burden these pathogens cause. Our goal is to identify prevalent misconceptions about ticks and tick-borne diseases to inform and restructure public health education efforts, thereby reducing the health burden related to tick-borne diseases. Methods We collected public Facebook posts and comments during summer 2021 and used summative content analysis to characterize misinformation themes. In total, 170 posts and 2483 comments were analyzed. Results A total of 30 posts (17% of the total) contained misinformation, the majority of which (78%) occurred in the context of tick biology and ecology and 5% and 4% were about repelling and removing ticks, respectively. Conclusions These findings suggest that public health education campaigns should focus on dispelling common misperceptions related to tick biology, ecology, and species identification.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Reference54 articles.

1. Where we go from here: health misinformation on social media;Sylvia Chou WY;Am J Public Health,2020

2. Trust in health care in the time of COVID-19;Baker DW;JAMA,2020

3. Infodemics and health misinformation: a systematic review of reviews;Borges do Nascimento IJ;Bull World Health Organ,2022

4. Defining and measuring scientific misinformation;Southwell BG;Ann Am Acad Polit SS,2022

5. Science audiences, misinformation, and fake news;Scheufele DA;PNAS,2019

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3