Moral Values in Medical AI: A Scoping Review

Author:

Victor Gavin1ORCID,Barbu Andreea1,Bélisle-Pipon Jean-Christophe1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Simon Fraser University

Abstract

Abstract

This article presents a scoping review of the relevant research discussing the ethics of medical artificial intelligence (AI). Relevant moral and human values can inform the design of ethical medical AI. The value sensitive design (VSD) framework offers a method by which to do this. But much conceptual work must be done in order to apply the VSD framework to medical AI. The goal of this review is to survey existing literature discussing moral and human values (such as responsibility, transparency, and respect for autonomy) in medical AI development. Ultimately, the objective of the review is to advance the VSD methodology for medical AI technologies, in which relevant moral values will inform technology design. Papers were considered eligible if they fulfilled three criteria: (1) provided a discussion of one or multiple moral, ethical, or human values (2) regarding AI or machine learning in a (3) medical, clinical, or health context. We conducted our search on five databases: OVID Embase, OVID Medline, IEEE, Web of Science, and Scopus. After performing our search, we screened title and abstract, then the full text of each paper for relevance using the Covidence platform. After the final sample was determined, we extracted relevant information by coding the papers using NVivo. We found nearly 100 moral values discussed regarding medical AI. In this search we were able to find not only which values are most discussed and how, but also specific, unique, and emerging moral values in the medical AI domain.

Funder

National Institutes of Health

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference141 articles.

1. Artificial Intelligence Is Trusted Less than a Doctor in Medical Treatment Decisions: Influence of Perceived Care and Value Similarity. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HUMAN-COMPUTER INTERACTION;Yokoi R,2021

2. AI-Assisted Decision-making in Healthcare: The Application of an Ethics Framework for Big Data in Health and Research;Lysaght T;Asian Bioeth Rev,2019

3. Computer knows best? the need for value-flexibility in medical AI;McDougall RJ;J Med Ethics,2019

4. Afnan M, Afnan M, Liu Y, Savulescu J, Mishra A, Conitzer V, Rudin C (2022) Reprod Biomed Online 45:10–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2022.03.015. Data solidarity for machine learning for embryo selection: a call for the creation of an open access repository of embryo data

5. Sendak M, Elish M, Gao M, Futoma J, Ratliff W, Nichols M, Bedoya A, Balu S, O’Brien C (2020) Assoc Comp Machinery: The Human Body is a Black Box: Supporting Clinical Decision-Making with Deep Learning. Presented at the FAT* ’20: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2020 CONFERENCE ON FAIRNESS, ACCOUNTABILITY, AND TRANSPARENCY

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3