Computer knows best? The need for value-flexibility in medical AI

Author:

McDougall Rosalind JORCID

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly being developed for use in medicine, including for diagnosis and in treatment decision making. The use of AI in medical treatment raises many ethical issues that are yet to be explored in depth by bioethicists. In this paper, I focus specifically on the relationship between the ethical ideal of shared decision making and AI systems that generate treatment recommendations, using the example of IBM’s Watson for Oncology. I argue that use of this type of system creates both important risks and significant opportunities for promoting shared decision making. If value judgements are fixed and covert in AI systems, then we risk a shift back to more paternalistic medical care. However, if designed and used in an ethically informed way, AI could offer a potentially powerful way of supporting shared decision making. It could be used to incorporate explicit value reflection, promoting patient autonomy. In the context of medical treatment, we need value-flexible AI that can both respond to the values and treatment goals of individual patients and support clinicians to engage in shared decision making.

Publisher

BMJ

Subject

Health Policy,Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous),Issues, ethics and legal aspects,Health(social science)

Reference43 articles.

1. O’Neill M . ABC News. Explainer: what is artificial intelligence? 2017. http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-08-07/explainer-what-is-artificial-intelligence/8771632 (Accessed 11 Oct 2017).

2. Poole DL , Mackworth AK , Goebel R . Computational intelligence: a logical approach. New York: Oxford University Press, 1998.

3. Walsh T . It’s alive!: artificial intelligence from the logic piano to killer robots. Carlton, Vic: La Trobe University Press, 2017.

4. Mukherjee S. , AI versus MD . The New Yorker. 2017. https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2017/04/03/ai-versus-md (Accessed 15 Jul 2018).

5. McCredie J ; MJA Insight. Artificial intelligence: augmenting or replacing doctors? 2017. https://www.doctorportal.com.au/mjainsight/2017/29/artificial-intelligence-augmenting-or-replacing-doctors/ (Accessed 20 Feb 2018).

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3