Enhancing the clinical reasoning of new graduate nurses: An experimental study using pre-test and post-test measures

Author:

Tan Hui Luan1,Eng Chui Lee1,Tan Delphine Hui Fang1,Oh Hui Yen1,Loo Benny Kai Guo1

Affiliation:

1. KK Women's and Children's Hospital

Abstract

Abstract Background: This study examined the development of clinical reasoning abilities among new graduate nurses in a hospital setting. A blended learning approach incorporating a serious gaming platform, Socratic questioning, self-assessment, and facilitator feedback was used to improve their ability to reason clinically in actual patient cases. Method: This study used a blended learning approach to examine how including a serious gaming platform, Socratic questioning, self-assessment, and facilitator feedback impacted the clinical reasoning abilities of new graduate nurses when evaluating patient cases. We conducted a Paired Sample t-test using a validated rubric to evaluate the potential enhancement of clinical reasoning abilities. Results: The results showed a noticeable disparity in the scores of clinical reasoning from the initial pre-test to the first post-test (M= -6.54 SD = 5.754) (t = -5.334, df = 21, p = 0.000), and from the initial pre-test to the second post-test (M = -9.54 SD = 5.115) (t = -8.752, df = 21, p = 0.000), at a significance level of 0.05, with p value less than 0.05. The study found that the effect size, d, was 0.53 indicating a medium effect size. In addition to quantitative data, nurses' perceptions of the blended learning approach incorporating the serious gaming platform, Socratic questioning, self-written case scenarios, and facilitator feedback were also reported to provide qualitative insights into the approach's effectiveness for nurses. Conclusions: Study findings suggest that integrating a serious gaming platform (thinking aloud), self-assessment, facilitator feedback (using self-written case scenarios), and Socratic questioning effectively enhanced the clinical reasoning skills of nurses. Specifically, nurses were better able to form well-supported reasons and judgments when evaluating patient cases. These findings suggest that using a serious gaming platform with Socratic questions can enhance nurses' clinical reasoning skills through written and oral discussions.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3