Critical Assessment of the Implications of Self-medication With Natural Products During Disease Outbreaks Among People in Developing Countries

Author:

ADEBIYI Salem Kivos1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. University of Central Lancashire

Abstract

Abstract Background: Self-medication with natural products during disease outbreaks is a major public health challenge in developing countries. Unlike self-medication with Over the counter (OTC) medication which receives significant attention in published literature, natural products have significant health implications, especially during times of disease outbreaks which are yet to be fully explored. Not backed by scientific evidence, the act can lead to a false sense of security among people, leading to a further spread of the disease amongst other implications. People need to be informed about self-medication risks and the professionally prescribed benefits of natural products and to seek appropriate medical care when necessary. Objectives: The purpose of this dissertation is to assess the implications of self-medication with natural products during disease outbreaks among people in developing countries. It tries to answer the following questions: (1) what is the state and quality of evidence in current literature (2) what are the gaps in literature (3) what are the determinants and contributing factors to self-medication with natural products during disease outbreaks among people in developing countries (4) what are the implications and (5) what are the possible solutions? Method: This dissertation was conducted using a modified systematic literature review methodology. The search protocol utilised for the search and selection of relevant materials from literature used in synthesising the findings of the study was documented using the PRISMA. The database search result was selected for review after the application of limiters, duplicate removals, exclusion and inclusion criteria, full-text review, and screening. The final selected articles were assessed for quality and bias using the 20 points system in AXIS critical evaluation tool. Data were extracted into themes using a Microsoft word table from which findings were synthesised. Findings: The initial database search yielded 1,683 reports from which 20 articles were selected for the review. Overall, 71.4% of the 14 articles assessed for quality and bias accrued 15 or more points on the 20 points system in AXIS critical evaluation tool, indicating that they were relatively of good quality. While all twenty (20) articles mentioned at least three or more factors or determinants of self-medication with natural products during disease outbreaks, only six (6) articles mentioned one or more implications, therefore demonstrating that there is a dearth in literature in this regard, which needs more exploration. The findings indicate that women are more likely to self-medicate with natural products than men, acquisition and ideological factors had the most influence on self-medication while the most common side effects were Diarrhoea, Stomach pain, Sweating, Headache, and Nausea/vomiting. Findings indicate that steam inhalation and herbal baths increased the risk of COVID-19 infection and people who self-medicate with natural products are more withdrawn and had less communication with their physicians. These people may suffer side effects not reported to their doctor and this might account for the paucity of reports on the implications of natural products used during disease outbreaks. Conclusion and implication of key finding:The use of natural products for self-medication during disease outbreak is a rampant practice in developing countries. While natural products may be more readily available, accessible, and affordable, there are potential risks and implications of natural products' use for self-medication. People need to be informed about this, encouraged to speak about their predicaments and seek appropriate medical care and support when necessary.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3