Prevalence, determinants and knowledge about herbal medicine and non-hospital utilisation in southwest Nigeria: a cross-sectional study

Author:

Aina Olujimi,Gautam LataORCID,Simkhada Padam,Hall Sarah

Abstract

ObjectivesTo examine the prevalence, determinants, safety perceptions, effectiveness and knowledge of herbal medicines (HMs) and reasons for non-hospital utilisation.DesignCross-sectional study.SettingEkiti state, southwest Nigeria.ParticipantsA representative sample (n=1600) of adults (18 years or above) currently living in Ekiti state, southwest Nigeria for at least 2 years, at the time of study.ResultsThe majority of the respondents (85% n=1265) have used HMs in the last 2 years. Across economic classes use, middle income (88.3%) was the highest (p<0.001), suggesting poverty is not a major factor, even with income inequality. Their use was the most common among respondents with a primary level of education (91.4%, p=0.001); and 100% use (p=0.009) of respondents practising African traditional religion; farmers and those 70 years or above. Our study also reveals more men (p<0.001) used HMs (89.9%) than women (78.6%) and effectiveness was a major reason for use (39.6%) followed by affordability (31.9%). Although the majority of the respondents (90%) knew the difference between certified and uncertified HMs, uncertified ones were the most commonly used (37.3%) in the population.ConclusionAlthough there is a cultural history of HM use within the study population, the choice of use was based on their effectiveness. Therefore, a scientifically valid analysis of this claim within the study population may help achieve a cheaper and affordable healthcare alternative which will be safe. This is important, considering that uncertified HMs were chosen over certified ones, even though a large majority of respondents were aware of differences and likely consequences. This study highlights the need for further investment by the government, individuals and corporate stakeholders in HM research and improvement of conventional healthcare system. This is in addition to public health awareness on the danger of use of uncertified herbal products.

Publisher

BMJ

Subject

General Medicine

Reference73 articles.

1. Use and acceptance of complementary and alternative medicine among the general population and medical personnel: a systematic review;Frass;Ochsner J,2012

2. World Health Organization (WHO) . Traditional complementary and integrative medicine. Available: https://www.who.int/traditional-complementary-integrative-medicine/about/en/ [Accessed 03 Nov 2019].

3. Bodeker C , Bodeker G , Ong CK , et al . WHO global atlas of traditional, complementary and alternative medicine. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO, 2005.

4. Bandaranayake WM . Quality Control, Screening, Toxicity, and Regulation of Herbal Drugs. In: Modern Phytomedicine. Turning medicinal plants into drugs. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH GmbH & Co. KGaA, 2006: 25–57.

5. Practitioners of Western herbal medicine and their practice in the UK: beginning to sketch the profession;Nissen;Complement Ther Clin Pract,2010

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3